Automated Bore Diameter Probe for Aircraft Holes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring hole bore diameter as a function of depth in aircraft and spacecraft are inefficient, requiring inspectors to manually hunt for maximum and minimum diameters, which is time-consuming and skill-dependent, often missing true measurements due to uncontrolled depth insertion.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using a diametric probe with a linear distance probe and data acquisition system to measure bore diameter and depth simultaneously, allowing for rapid, accurate measurements at two orientations and providing data on hole quality and material properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual hole diameter measurement methods are used, then measurement capability is achieved, but measurement time is excessive (90 seconds per hole) and productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole diameter measurement capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement with an automated optical measurement system. The probe assembly uses optical sensors and light sources to automatically measure hole diameter at multiple depths, eliminating the need for manual operation and significantly reducing measurement time while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system automatically performs depth control, data collection, and analysis without operator intervention. The probe assembly self-regulates descent rate, automatically records measurements at specified depths, and generates reports, freeing inspectors from time-consuming manual hunting for maximum and minimum diameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual depth control during measurement is used, then measurement capability is achieved, but depth control precision is poor and true maximum/minimum diameters are often missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to find true max/min diameterVSAvoiddepth control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual depth control with an automated electronic control system. The probe assembly uses a motorized drive mechanism controlled by a processor to descend at a precise, pre-programmed rate, automatically positioning the measurement probe at exact depths specified in the measurement plan, thereby eliminating operator skill dependence and ensuring true maximum and minimum diameters are captured

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates depth sensors and position feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor probe descent and provide real-time feedback to the control system. This closed-loop control ensures the probe reaches exact target depths and maintains precise positioning throughout the measurement process, guaranteeing accurate capture of diameter variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If single-orientation measurement is used, then measurement simplicity is maintained, but measurement completeness is insufficient (cannot detect roundness and defects)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system simplicityVSAvoidhole quality information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process into multiple orientations and depths. The probe assembly automatically rotates to measure diameter at different angular positions (e.g., 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) and at multiple depth intervals, collecting comprehensive data that reveals roundness variations, ovality, and internal defects that would be invisible in single-orientation measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional single-plane measurement to three-dimensional multi-orientation measurement. By measuring diameter at multiple angular positions around the hole circumference and at multiple depths along the hole axis, the system creates a complete 3D profile of the hole geometry, enabling detection of roundness, ovality, taper, and other geometric deviations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2047207B1Method and apparatus for hole diameter profile measurement
Publication Date: 2015.07.08 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2047207B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2047207B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2047207B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A method and apparatus for measuring the bore diameter of a hole as a function of hole depth is disclosed. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises a diametric probe, for generating first measured bore diameter data along a diametric probe sensitive axis; a foot, for positioning the diametric probe sensitive axis in a plane parallel to the hole; a linear distance probe, coupled to the diametric probe, for generating first measured depth data describing the depth of the diametric probe sensitive axis within the hole; and a data acquisition system, for recording first measured bore diameter data from the diametric probe and first measured depth data from the linear distance probe of an insertion of the diametric probe into the hole.