Borehole Plug Split Lock Ring Shear Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing borehole plug designs face high shear loading issues due to fracturing pressures, leading to ratchet teeth failure and prolonged milling times for removal, especially when multiple plugs need to be quickly removed during treatments like fracturing, and existing solutions fail to efficiently retrieve plugs to the surface using formation pressure.

Innovation Solution

A borehole plug design featuring a split lock ring with a wedge sectional shape and downhole-oriented surface treatment that resists reaction forces, allowing differential pressure handling and plug retrieval by flowing back the plug under reduced pressure from above, aided by wiper devices that accommodate tubular size changes during ascent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ratcheting body lock ring assembly is used to maintain the set position of the borehole plug, then the plug can hold differential pressure from above, but the ratchet teeth break under high shear loading from fracturing pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to hold differential pressureVSAvoidresistance to shear loading
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the vulnerable ratcheting mechanism entirely and extracts only the essential locking function. The body lock ring assembly is replaced with a simpler design that eliminates ratchet teeth, thereby removing the component that failed under shear loading while retaining the ability to maintain the set position against differential pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs a disposable body lock ring assembly that is designed to be set and then retrieved or left in place after use. This approach accepts the component as single-use, eliminating the need for complex, durable ratcheting mechanisms and allowing optimization for initial setting reliability rather than repeated use durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Loss of time

If the borehole plug is designed for quick removal during treating operations, then milling time is reduced, but the lock ring must withstand high shear loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling time for plug removalVSAvoidshear loading resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the problematic ratcheting mechanism that required milling for removal and replaces it with a design that can be quickly retrieved or left in place. This eliminates the need for time-consuming milling operations while the simplified lock ring design reduces shear loading concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic retrieval capability where the plug can be quickly pulled out of the borehole using a retrieval tool that engages with the plug body. This dynamic removal method replaces the static milling process, dramatically reducing removal time without requiring the lock ring to withstand extreme shear loads during removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple plugs need to be removed during fracturing treatments, then productivity is maintained, but milling each plug prolongs the overall process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction continuity during treatmentVSAvoidtotal removal time for multiple plugs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the time-consuming milling step from the plug removal process. By eliminating the ratcheting mechanism that requires milling, each plug can be quickly retrieved or left in place, allowing multiple plugs to be handled in rapid succession without interrupting production continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention designs the plug with a retrieval mechanism that allows quick engagement and extraction. The body lock ring assembly is configured to work with retrieval tools that can be deployed immediately after treatment, enabling preliminary preparation for rapid removal of multiple plugs without requiring milling operations between treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Stability of the object's composition

If the lock ring is designed to prevent relative movement in the opposite direction, then the set position is maintained, but the ratchet teeth are subjected to high shear loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance of set positionVSAvoidresistance to shear loading on ratchet teeth
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the ratcheting mechanism that created the shear loading problem while retaining the essential function of preventing relative movement. The body lock ring assembly uses a different approach to maintain set position that does not involve interlocking ratchet teeth, thereby eliminating the shear loading vulnerability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical ratcheting system with a different locking mechanism that uses friction, deformation, or alternative mechanical principles to prevent relative movement. This substitution eliminates the ratchet teeth and their associated shear loading issues while maintaining the stability of the set position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces shear stress on the lock ring, enables efficient plug retrieval without milling, and shortens removal time by allowing plugs to be captured above or below the wellhead, maintaining production continuity without the need for milling.

Implementation Method 1

an apparatus is employed that can enlarge to bridge a growing gap on the way out of the borehole so that the plug velocity with formation pressure can continue to move the flowed plug back to capture equipment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The ring is tapered in cross section to allow it to act as a wedge against reaction force tending to relax the components from the set position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge: Wedge

Implementation Method 3

The side of the ring facing the mandrel has a surface treatment that provides minimal resistance in the setting direction and digs into the mandrel to resist reaction forces from the compressed sealing element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10450827B2Capture method for flow back retrieval of borehole plug with a lower slip assembly
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US10450827B2 patent drawing
  • US10450827B2 patent drawing
  • US10450827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A borehole plug or packer for treating is designed to be flowed back to a surface location after use. When the treatment is concluded pressure from above is relieved or lowered, and well fluid is flowed back, so that the plug or plugs disengages at slips designed to resist differential pressure from above. The application of differential pressure from below causes the lower slips to release one or more of such plugs in the hole into specialized sub surface or surface capture equipment so that well pressure is relieved before removal of the plugs from specialized subsurface or surface capture equipment. Packers or plugs are captured above, below or at a wellhead in a receptacle. Production ensues without milling with the captured plugs or packers in place or removed.