Borescope Image Repositioning for Automated Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video inspection devices for industrial machines require manual analysis by human operators, which is slow, expensive, and prone to errors, and do not facilitate easy acquisition of new images if the initial inspection region image is inadequate for defect identification.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using a borescope with a camera and light source, controlled by a controller, that identifies defects, determines the need for new images, and adjusts camera and light source positions/orientations to acquire high-resolution, stereoscopic, or 3D images for accurate defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual analysis by human operators is used, then defect identification can be performed, but the process is slow, expensive, and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-service by automatically analyzing captured images to identify defects, eliminating the need for human operator intervention. The processor automatically processes images from the camera, compares them against stored reference images, and identifies defects without human assistance, thereby improving both speed and consistency of inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/human inspection system with an automated electronic system. Instead of human operators visually inspecting components, the system uses a camera to capture images, a processor to analyze them, and automated comparison algorithms to identify defects, substituting human cognitive processing with electronic computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual analysis by human operators is used, then defect identification can be performed, but operational costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-service by automatically analyzing captured images to identify defects, eliminating the need for human operator intervention. The processor automatically processes images from the camera, compares them against stored reference images, and identifies defects without human assistance, thereby improving both speed and consistency of inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/human inspection system with an automated electronic system. Instead of human operators visually inspecting components, the system uses a camera to capture images, a processor to analyze them, and automated comparison algorithms to identify defects, substituting human cognitive processing with electronic computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If the initial inspection region image is inadequate for defect identification, then re-inspection is required, but acquiring new images is cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality for defect detectionVSAvoidtime to acquire new images
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback by automatically evaluating the quality of captured images and determining whether re-inspection is needed. The processor compares captured images against stored reference images and automatically identifies when the initial image is inadequate, triggering automated re-positioning and re-capture without manual intervention, thus reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning the camera and light source at optimal locations before inspection begins. The system captures multiple reference images at different positions and orientations in advance, storing them in a database for rapid comparison during actual inspection, thereby reducing the time needed for re-inspection when initial images are inadequate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If multiple images are captured from different positions and orientations, then defect identification accuracy improves, but the complexity of the inspection process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection process is segmented into distinct automated steps: the camera captures images at specific positions, the processor compares captured images against stored reference images, and the system automatically determines when re-inspection is needed. This segmentation of the inspection process into automated sub-tasks reduces overall complexity despite capturing multiple images from different positions and orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260057506A1Automated defect detection
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20260057506A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057506A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057506A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of nondestructive testing includes receiving data characterizing an image of an inspection region of an industrial machine acquired by an inspection device configured to inspect the inspection region. The inspection device includes a camera and a light source. The camera has a first position and a first orientation and the light source has a second position and a second orientation when the image is acquired. The method also includes identifying a defect in the inspection region of the industrial machine based on the received data characterizing the image of the inspection region. The method further includes determining that a new image of the inspection region needs to be acquired. The method also includes varying one or more of position of the camera, orientation of the camera, position of the light source and orientation of the light source.