Gas Turbine Sealing Interface Repair Using Boron-Modified Preform

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Oxidation erosion leads to damaged sealing interfaces in gas turbine engine BOAS assemblies, resulting in incomplete seals and reduced fuel efficiency due to air leakage.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a repair material composed of a parent metal (cobalt or nickel) and an additive material like boron, which lowers the melting point, allowing for metallurgical bonding and diffusion to restore the sealing interface, accompanied by a preform that reconstructs the damaged area and provides enhanced wear and oxidation resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If oxidation erosion is used to repair the damaged sealing interface, then the sealing interface can be restored, but the melting point and temperature resistance of the repaired area are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing interface integrityVSAvoidmelting point and temperature resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

A preform made of parent metal (cobalt or nickel) is positioned at the damaged sealing interface before applying the repair material. This preform serves as a sacrificial layer that will diffuse the additive material away from the critical sealing interface area during the heating process, thereby preserving the melting point and temperature resistance of the repaired sealing interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The preform acts as an intermediary between the repair material and the parent metal component. It facilitates the controlled diffusion of additive material (boron) away from the sealing interface while allowing the repair material to bond to the parent metal, thus mediating the trade-off between repair effectiveness and temperature resistance preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If additive material like boron is used to lower melting point for bonding, then metallurgical bonding is achieved, but temperature resistance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetallurgical bonding strengthVSAvoidtemperature resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The preform creates a non-uniform distribution of additive material concentration. The area near the sealing interface has lower additive concentration (higher temperature resistance) while the preform area has higher additive concentration (enables bonding). This local quality variation resolves the contradiction between achieving strong bonding and maintaining temperature resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves the problem from a two-dimensional surface repair to a three-dimensional volume control by introducing the preform as a separate volumetric element. The additive material diffusion is controlled in the depth dimension through the preform, allowing surface properties (temperature resistance) to be preserved while bulk bonding strength is achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively repairs damaged sealing interfaces by forming a strong bond with the parent material, maintaining original melting point and temperature resistance, thereby preventing further erosion and improving fuel efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an additive material like boron, which lowers the melting point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting point depression: Melting

Implementation Method 2

allowing for metallurgical bonding and diffusion to restore the sealing interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP2942141B1Method for repairing a metal component
Publication Date: 2017.10.04 UNITED TECH CORP
  • EP2942141B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2942141B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1D
  • EP2942141B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C

AI summary

A structural element and method for repairing a damaged portion (114) of a metal component utilizes a preform (202) configured to engage with the metal component and receive a repair material. The preform (202) may be made of a material having a first melting point, and the repair material may be made of a material having a second melting point that is lower than the first melting point. The preform (202) may be a mold configured to reconstruct the shape of the damaged portion (114) of the metal component. The repair material may include a first material and an additive material, such as boron. The repair material may have a melting point that is approximately 40 degrees Fahrenheit (22°C) lower than the melting point of the metal component.