Boss Cracking Detection Using Diametric Piezoelectric Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting damage in the bosses of composite cylinders, particularly blind bosses, are inadequate due to the inaccessible nature of the fractured surface, making it challenging to assess cracking using traditional non-destructive testing methods.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising broadband piezoelectric sensors strategically positioned on the outer surface of the boss's neck, which detect deformation data and utilize modal acoustic emission analysis to determine if a boss cracking event has occurred, including phase shift, arrival time differences, and frequency content analysis to identify crack extension or closure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional non-destructive testing methods are used to detect damage in blind bosses, then the inspection process is simple, but the detection capability is insufficient due to inaccessible fractured surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical non-destructive testing methods with an acoustic emission-based sensing system. Sensors detect deformation data and acoustic signals from crack events, eliminating the need for physical access to fractured surfaces while significantly improving detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensors as intermediary devices that indirectly detect crack events through deformation data and acoustic emissions. This intermediary approach allows detection of internal crack events in blind bosses without direct access to the fractured surfaces, resolving the accessibility problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If sensors are placed on the boss neck to detect deformation data, then crack detection accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack event detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor placement and data analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places sensors at specific locations on the boss neck where deformation data and acoustic emissions from crack events are most prominent. This localized sensor placement optimizes detection accuracy while minimizing the number of sensors required, balancing precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent pre-positions sensors on the boss neck before crack events occur, ensuring they are in optimal locations to detect deformation data and acoustic emissions. This preliminary placement simplifies the detection process and reduces the need for complex real-time sensor positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If modal acoustic emission analysis is used to analyze deformation data, then detection reliability improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboss cracking detection reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic analysis of deformation data through modal acoustic emission techniques, analyzing signals at specific intervals and frequency ranges. This periodic approach identifies characteristic crack event patterns reliably while maintaining efficient processing speeds by focusing on relevant time windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial analysis by focusing on specific frequency ranges and signal characteristics associated with crack events, rather than analyzing all possible signal parameters. This selective analysis maintains high detection reliability while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively detects fatigue crack growth and damage in composite overwrapped pressure vessel bosses, preventing the reuse of compromised cylinders by providing accurate and timely notifications of potential damage.

Implementation Method 1

The first sensor and the second sensor may be broadband piezoelectric sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The controller may determine whether the boss cracking event has occurred using modal acoustic emission (MAE) to analyze the first deformation data and the second deformation data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic emission: Acoustic Emission

Data Source

PatentUS11927567B2Cylinder boss cracking detection system
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 HEXAGON TECHNOLOGY AS
  • US11927567B2 patent drawing
  • US11927567B2 patent drawing
  • US11927567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system for monitoring a boss of a composite structure for a boss cracking event. The system includes a first sensor located on an outer surface of a neck of the boss and configured to detect first deformation data associated with the boss. The system also includes a second sensor located on the outer surface of the neck of the boss at a location diametrically opposite of the first sensor and configured to detect second deformation data associated with the boss. The system also includes a controller communicatively coupled to the first sensor and the second sensor and configured to determine, based on the first deformation data and the second deformation data, whether a boss cracking event has occurred.