Bottom-Loading Magazine for 5.7×28 mm AR-15/M16 Feeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for convenient means of bottom-loading 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm ammunition rounds into the AR-15 and M16 firearm platforms, as existing solutions require bulky top-loading or horizontal-loading magazine arrangements, which are inconvenient and not currently available for these calibers.

Innovation Solution

Development of ammunition magazines that allow for bottom-loading of 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm rounds into standard AR-15 or M16 upper receivers, featuring a magazine housing with lateral tines and a follower mechanism that stabilizes and aligns the rounds for smooth feeding, along with a floor plate system for easy loading and unloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If top-loading or horizontal-loading magazine arrangements are used for 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm rounds, then the ammunition can be loaded into AR-15 or M16 platforms, but the magazine arrangement becomes bulky and inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of loading ammunitionVSAvoidbulk of magazine arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional top-loading approach by implementing bottom-loading for the magazine. The magazine is designed with a bottom plate that can be removed to allow ammunition to be loaded from the bottom, reversing the traditional loading direction. This inversion enables a more compact integration with the AR-15/M16 platform while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The magazine design incorporates universal features that allow it to function with both 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm ammunition types. The magazine body, follower, and spring system are designed to accommodate different caliber rounds through adjustable or interchangeable components, eliminating the need for separate bulky magazine systems for each caliber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional magazine designs are adapted for 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm rounds, then these calibers can be used in AR-15 or M16 platforms, but the design becomes complex and non-standard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to use different calibers in AR-15/M16VSAvoidcomplexity of magazine design
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magazine is divided into functional segments: a removable bottom plate, a follower assembly, a spring system, and a body. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for handling different calibers while maintaining overall simplicity. The bottom plate can be removed for loading, and the follower can be adjusted for different round types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The magazine design utilizes parameter changes to accommodate different calibers. The internal dimensions, follower shape, and spring tension can be adjusted or modified to suit either 5.7×28 mm or 4.6×30 mm rounds. This allows a single basic design to handle multiple calibers without requiring completely different magazine systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If bottom-loading is implemented for 5.7×28 mm and 4.6×30 mm rounds, then loading convenience is improved and bulk is eliminated, but a new magazine design is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading convenienceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity of new design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate is extracted as a separate removable component from the magazine assembly. This allows the main magazine body to be manufactured as a simple, standardized component while the bottom plate serves as a separate loading access point. The extracted bottom plate design simplifies the overall manufacturing process compared to creating an entirely new integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The follower assembly and spring system are nested within the magazine body in a compact arrangement. The follower sits within the magazine cavity, with the spring positioned to push the follower upward. This nested configuration allows all necessary components to be housed within a compact volume, achieving bottom-loading functionality without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and convenient loading of ammunition without removing the magazine, improving usability and allowing side-ejection of spent casings through the standard AR-15 or M16 upper receiver.

Implementation Method 1

a spring within the magazine housing, the spring having a top end attached to a magazine follower and bottom end attached to floor plate retainer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12578157B2Ammunition magazine
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 PERFETTO PERFORMANCE INC
  • US12578157B2 patent drawing
  • US12578157B2 patent drawing
  • US12578157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides ammunition magazines for bottom-loading a 5.7×28 mm ammunition round or a 4.6×30 mm ammunition round into a standard AR-15 or M16 upper receiver.