Bottoming Tap and Chaser for Deep Blind Hole Threading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing taps and chasers face challenges in deep blind holes due to the need for multiple tools of varying lengths, misalignment, debris build-up, and increased risk of breakage, especially when using long tools in confined spaces.

Innovation Solution

A tap and chaser design with a cylindrical receiver and threading section connected by a shaft, allowing full insertion and alignment within the bore hole, featuring a central bore for extraction, and spiral flutes for efficient debris removal, along with a drive socket for standard ratchet drivers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If long tools are used to reach deep blind holes, then the tool can access the hole, but alignment between the tool and hole is lost increasing cross-threading risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lengthVSAvoidthread alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into a receiver portion that remains outside the hole and a threading section that enters the hole. The receiver has a reduced diameter to fit within the hole while the threading section performs the cutting operation, separating the alignment function from the cutting function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A pilot or alignment feature is introduced as an intermediary element that guides the threading section into proper alignment with the hole before cutting begins. This pilot acts as a mediator between the tool and the workpiece to ensure coaxial alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple taps and chasers of different lengths are maintained for deep blind holes, then various depths can be accommodated, but tool inventory complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth accommodationVSAvoidtool inventory
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tool incorporates an adjustable extension mechanism that allows the effective length of the threading section to be changed without replacing the entire tool. This dynamic adjustment capability enables a single tool to accommodate multiple hole depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The receiver is designed with a universal interface that can accept different threading sections or extensions, allowing one base tool to perform multiple functions at different depths. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for multiple specialized tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Length of moving object

If long tools are used in deep blind holes, then the hole can be tapped, but clearance distance requirements severely limit usable locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lengthVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the tool into a compact receiver and a threading section, the overall tool length is reduced while maintaining the ability to reach deep holes. The receiver portion fits within the hole opening, eliminating the need for large clearance distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tool design transitions from a long axial configuration to a compact configuration where the receiver fits radially within the hole opening. This dimensional change allows access to confined spaces without requiring extensive linear clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If standard t-handle drivers are used with taps, then the tap can be driven, but the driver prevents the tap from being used in deep blind holes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving capabilityVSAvoidtool length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The driving interface is extracted from the traditional t-handle configuration and relocated to the receiver portion of the tool. This allows the driving mechanism to be positioned outside the hole while the threading section operates inside, combining ease of operation with deep hole capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250249522A1Bottoming tap and chaser and method of use
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 CORBIT DEVIN
  • US20250249522A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249522A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249522A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tap and chaser are provided each having a cylindrical tool receiver connected to a threading section by a shaft. The receiver and shaft are of diameters sufficiently small to enter the bore hole and distribute any off axis load onto a number of internal threads of the bore hole to dissipate loading. A central bore is provided for broken tool extraction. The threaded section includes a group of longitudinal flutes. Each of the lands of the threaded section includes a novel cutting face, tooth angle and rake angle to advantageously allow for threading deep blind holes.