Image and Video Deblocking Filter Lengths Based on Boundary Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing demand for high-resolution and high-quality images and videos, particularly in immersive media formats like VR and AR, necessitates a high-efficiency compression technology to reduce transmission and storage costs while improving image quality through optimized deblocking filtering.

Innovation Solution

Determine filter lengths based on the distance between neighboring edges in the deblocking filtering process, with specific lengths for luma and chroma component blocks, and perform deblocking filtering accordingly to enhance image quality and simplify hardware design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If deblocking filtering is applied to improve image quality, then subjective image quality is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple filter length determination conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidfilter length determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the filter length determination process by separating luma and chroma component processing, applying different filter length rules to each component based on their specific characteristics. This segmentation allows optimized filtering without requiring a single complex universal determination method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by determining filter lengths differently for luma and chroma components based on their specific spatial characteristics and viewing requirements. The luma component receives longer filter lengths (0-7) while chroma receives shorter lengths (0-3), optimizing each component's filtering according to its local quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If filter length is increased to improve boundary smoothing, then image quality improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary smoothing qualityVSAvoidfiltering processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different filter lengths to different components based on their local quality requirements. Luma components receive longer filter lengths (0-7 taps) for better boundary smoothing where human vision is most sensitive, while chroma components receive shorter filter lengths (0-3 taps) where color detail is more important than perfect boundary smoothing, thus reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial filtering action by selectively applying deblocking filtering only when boundary strength exceeds a threshold, and applying different intensities (filter lengths) based on component type and boundary characteristics, rather than uniformly applying maximum filtering throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If separate filter lengths are applied to luma and chroma components, then filtering optimization is achieved, but hardware design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering optimization efficiencyVSAvoidhardware design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the filtering process into separate handling of luma and chroma components, each with its own filter length determination logic. This segmentation enables independent optimization of each component's filtering parameters without requiring a single complex unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality by implementing a unified deblocking filtering framework that handles both luma and chroma components through the same structural process, differing only in the specific filter length values applied. This multi-functional approach optimizes both components while maintaining consistent hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If filter length is reduced to simplify processing, then device complexity is reduced, but image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering process complexityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by matching filter lengths to the specific requirements of different components. Luma components receive longer filter lengths (0-7) where boundary artifacts are most visually noticeable, while chroma components receive shorter filter lengths (0-3) where color accuracy is more critical, thus optimizing image quality without uniformly increasing complexity throughout the entire processing pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250301133A1Image or video coding using deblocking filtering
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US20250301133A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301133A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301133A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to the disclosure of the present document, filter length can be determined on the basis of the distance between block boundaries in a deblocking filtering process, the deblocking filtering can be performed on the basis of the filter length, and thereby, the picture quality of the image/video can be enhanced, and the effects of improved subjective picture quality relative to complexity and simplification of H/W design can be obtained.