Boundary Sample Selection for Device Deterioration Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Outdoor devices such as transformers with metal housings deteriorate due to moisture and salt exposure, leading to rust and impaired durability, with workers sometimes incorrectly deciding to discard or reuse devices, resulting in increased operational costs and potential public safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving deterioration acceleration treatments to determine the reuse threshold of devices by calculating an upper limit of deterioration based on new and repaired device trends, selecting a boundary sample indicating the limit state for device reuse, and registering this standard in a database for informed decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a worker determines whether to discard or reuse a device based on personal judgment, then the decision process is simple and quick, but the accuracy of the decision deteriorates leading to incorrect reuse or disposal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision process simplicityVSAvoiddecision accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary deterioration acceleration treatments on sample devices before establishing the boundary sample criteria. By pre-testing and pre-establishing the boundary sample based on accelerated aging data, the system prepares decision-making standards in advance, eliminating the need for complex real-time judgments while ensuring accurate reuse decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a boundary sample that serves as a reference model representing the maximum acceptable deterioration level. Workers can directly compare actual devices against this copied standard rather than making subjective judgments, ensuring consistent and accurate decision-making without requiring complex evaluation processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If a worker with little knowledge discards a reusable device, then the risk of using defective devices is reduced, but operational cost increases due to premature disposal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice safetyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The boundary sample serves as a reference model that captures the maximum acceptable deterioration level. By comparing actual devices against this standardized reference, the system enables accurate assessment of device condition, ensuring that reusable devices are not prematurely discarded while maintaining safety standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the abstract concept of device condition into a quantifiable parameter by measuring deterioration extent and comparing it against the boundary sample's deterioration level. This parameter-based approach converts subjective judgment into objective measurement, enabling cost-effective reuse decisions without compromising reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If a worker with little knowledge reuses a device that should be discarded, then operational cost is reduced, but the risk of device failure and public disaster increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoiddevice safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The boundary sample provides a standardized reference that clearly defines the maximum acceptable deterioration level. Workers can objectively compare actual devices against this reference model, ensuring that devices exceeding the boundary are not reused, thereby preventing safety incidents while avoiding unnecessary disposal of still-functional devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a clear feedback mechanism where device condition is assessed against the boundary sample standard. This feedback loop provides workers with objective criteria for decision-making, reducing reliance on personal judgment and ensuring consistent safety standards are applied across all reuse decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If deterioration acceleration treatment is performed on new and repaired devices, then the deterioration trend can be accurately determined, but the time and resources required for testing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeterioration trend accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies deterioration acceleration treatment that modifies environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, salt concentration) to speed up the deterioration process. By changing these parameters, the system achieves in compressed time what would normally take years of natural exposure, enabling rapid acquisition of accurate deterioration trends for establishing boundary samples

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10234374B2Method for selecting boundary sample, apparatus for selecting boundary sample, storage medium, and system for selecting boundary sample
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO HOLDINGS INC
  • US10234374B2 patent drawing
  • US10234374B2 patent drawing
  • US10234374B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is used for selecting a boundary sample. The method includes acquiring a deterioration trend of a new device by performing a deterioration acceleration treatment to the new device, acquiring deterioration trends of a plurality of repaired devices which have been repaired after long-term use by performing a deterioration acceleration treatment to the plurality of repaired devices, calculating an upper limit of deterioration of the repaired device based on the deterioration trend of the new device, and selecting a boundary sample indicating a limit state in which the device can be reused as a standard of reuse of the device by specifying a repaired device having the largest deterioration among the repaired devices having a deterioration not larger than the upper limit.