Bounding Box Auto Segmentation for Low-Label Food Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current food identification technologies using deep learning for image recognition face challenges due to the need for large amounts of manually labeled data, which is time-consuming and costly, and the low accuracy of food type identification, leading to errors in calorie counting and inefficient food management.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for auto segmentation using a bounding box through weakly-supervised learning, where a segmentation model is trained using bounding box labels and color similarity maps to classify objects and backgrounds, with auto-labeling through user inspection for prediction errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual labeling is used to obtain training data for deep learning models, then data quality can be ensured, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidlabeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automatically generated bounding box labels from detector models to train segmentation models, which then perform auto-labeling on new images. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual pixel-level annotation while maintaining data quality through iterative model improvement and edge-case focused learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The approach performs preliminary bounding box labeling using detector models before segmentation labeling. This preliminary action provides a foundation that reduces subsequent manual work, as the bounding boxes serve as pre-processing that guides the segmentation model training and reduces the need for complete manual annotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If segmentation models are trained with pixel-level labels, then segmentation accuracy improves, but labeling cost and complexity increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidlabeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The methodology segments the labeling process into two stages: first generating bounding box labels using detector models, then using these bounding boxes to train segmentation models for pixel-level segmentation. This segmentation of the labeling task reduces complexity by breaking down the difficult pixel-level annotation into easier bounding box annotation followed by automated segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Bounding box labels serve as an intermediary between simple object detection and complex pixel-level segmentation. The detector model generates bounding boxes that act as intermediate training data, which then trains the segmentation model to achieve pixel-level accuracy without requiring direct manual pixel annotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If more training data is collected to improve model performance, then model accuracy increases, but data processing time and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system focuses on learning from edge-case data where the model does not provide satisfactory predictions rather than processing all available data uniformly. This partial action approach improves model accuracy by concentrating computational resources on difficult cases that benefit most from additional learning, rather than processing excessive amounts of already-well-handled data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The methodology changes the parameter of data selection from random or uniform sampling to edge-case focused sampling. By identifying and prioritizing difficult prediction cases, the system optimizes data processing efficiency while maintaining or improving model accuracy through targeted learning on challenging examples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260044962A1Methods and apparatuses for auto segmentation using bounding box
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 NUVI LABS CO LTD
  • US20260044962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044962A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method and an apparatus for auto segmentation using a bounding box. A method for auto segmentation using a bounding box according to one embodiment of the present disclosure comprises receiving a first object image including an object labeled with a bounding box, which is a pre-learning target, learning a segmentation model by classifying an object and a background from the bounding box of the received first object image, and segmenting an object from a second object image, which is an identification target, using the learned segmentation model.