Bounding Shape Localization Using Physical Ground Truth Tagging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for training neural networks for object detection require accurate labeling of bounding shapes, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors, especially when determining object dimensions for real-world distance estimation.

Innovation Solution

A method for automatic tagging using physical ground truth, which involves obtaining sensed information units, calculating actual dimensions of objects, determining SIU dimensions, and generating tags for accurate bounding shape localization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation is used to label bounding boxes for object detection training, then labeling accuracy can be ensured, but time consumption and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebounding box labeling accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption for data labeling
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-labeling of bounding boxes by utilizing the neural network model itself to generate annotations. The model processes images and automatically produces bounding box labels without human intervention, allowing the system to serve its own labeling needs while maintaining consistent accuracy standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the labeling task from a manual annotation process to an automated parameter extraction process. By changing the approach from human-driven visual annotation to algorithm-driven coordinate extraction, the system achieves both time efficiency and labeling precision through automated image processing and coordinate calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated labeling methods are used to reduce time consumption, then productivity increases, but labeling accuracy and precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata labeling throughputVSAvoidbounding box localization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual annotation process with an automated computational system. Instead of human operators manually drawing bounding boxes, the system uses neural network inference and coordinate transformation algorithms to automatically generate precise bounding box labels, substituting human manual work with automated computational mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated labeling module that acts as a mediator between the neural network model and the training data. This intermediary component processes model predictions and transforms them into standardized bounding box annotations, ensuring both automation and precision without direct human involvement in the labeling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If bounding boxes are manually adjusted to fit object boundaries precisely, then manufacturing precision of labels improves, but the complexity of the labeling process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebounding box boundary precisionVSAvoidlabeling process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the bounding box generation task from the complex manual annotation process. By separating the labeling function into an independent automated module that directly computes coordinates from image data and model predictions, the system achieves precise boundary fitting without the complexity of manual adjustment and verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If extensive manual verification is performed to ensure label quality, then reliability of training data improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data qualityVSAvoidlabeling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the automated labeling process continuously refines its output based on model confidence scores and validation checks. High-confidence predictions are automatically accepted, while lower-confidence cases trigger automated re-processing or selective verification, creating a self-correcting system that maintains high reliability without requiring extensive manual verification of every label.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250026375A1Accurate box localization for automatic tagging system using physical ground truth
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 AUTOBRAINS TECH LTD
  • US20250026375A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026375A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026375A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for segmentation-based generation of bounding shapes, the method may include obtaining bounding shapes that are indicative of objects, the objects were captured in a sensed information unit; generating a cropped image for each bounding shape; segmenting each cropped image to a cropped image background and a cropped image foreground; and generating, for each cropped image, an updated bounding shape that are indicative of dimensions of the cropped image foreground of the cropped image, to provide updated bounding shapes.