Bow-Shaped Front Crossbar Structure for Small Overlap Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current front vehicle body structures fail to effectively respond to small overlap collisions, particularly in electric vehicles with a frunk, leading to inadequate passenger protection and excessive damage, and are prone to weight increases that compromise efficiency and safety.

Innovation Solution

A front vehicle body reinforcing structure featuring a bow-shaped crossbar and support brackets with closed cross-sectional shapes, strategically positioned to distribute load and enhance collision response, including a crash box, bumper beam, and fender apron upper member, which supports the frunk and induces vehicle avoidance behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the outer portion of the vehicle body is excessively reinforced to protect against overlap collision, then collision response performance is improved, but vehicle weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision response performanceVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively reinforcing only the critical outer portion (front fender apron member) where overlap collision impact occurs, rather than uniformly reinforcing the entire vehicle body. This targeted reinforcement improves collision response performance while minimizing overall weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by integrating a reinforcing member made of high-strength material into the front fender apron member structure. This allows the outer portion to achieve enhanced collision resistance with reduced weight compared to using conventional materials throughout the entire body structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the front fender apron member is extended and connected to the front side member, then structural rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the reinforcing member with the front fender apron member into an integrated structure. This combination enhances structural rigidity by creating a continuous load path while avoiding the complexity of separate connecting components and assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The extended front fender apron member serves multiple functions: it acts as both the original fender apron structure and the reinforcing element simultaneously. This multi-functionality improves structural rigidity without adding separate reinforcing components that would increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If a straight crossbar is used to connect front side members, then manufacturing is simplified, but collision response performance in overlap collision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcollision response performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature to the crossbar, changing it from a straight line to an arc-shaped structure. This curved geometry improves collision response performance by better distributing impact forces during overlap collisions, while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing processes for forming curved metal sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the crossbar from linear (straight) to curved (arced). This parameter change optimizes the structural performance for overlap collision scenarios by creating a more effective load distribution path, while the curvature can be achieved through standard forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11198474B2Front vehicle body reinforcing structure
Publication Date: 2021.12.14 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11198474B2 patent drawing
  • US11198474B2 patent drawing
  • US11198474B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A front vehicle body reinforcing structure is provided to improve front collision response performance of a vehicle. The front vehicle body reinforcing structure includes a front side member that is disposed on each of left and right sides of a front vehicle body to extend in a front-rear direction of a vehicle body. A crossbar is installed to connect between the front side members on the left and right sides and has a form bent in a bow shape. Additionally, support brackets are installed to connect between left and right side portions of the crossbar and the front side members to support the crossbar at each of the front side members.