Bow-formed Bumper Beam with Variable Web Height

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bumper beams are either too rigid to absorb energy effectively in crashes against barriers or too weak to withstand impacts from thin poles, leading to localized collapse and buckling, especially when hit close to the vehicle's center.

Innovation Solution

A bow-formed bumper beam with a reduced web height towards the center, an open hat profile, and bent side flanges that can be fastened directly to vehicle supporting elements, made from high-strength steel or aluminum, featuring an elongate depression to enhance strength against local buckling while allowing for deformation in crashes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the bumper beam is made strong and stiff to withstand thin pole impacts, then it resists localized collapse and buckling, but it delays collapse in barrier crashes and fails to absorb energy effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to localized collapseVSAvoidenergy absorption in barrier crashes
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper beam features variable web height along its length, with the central portion having a reduced web height compared to the end portions. This creates different structural characteristics in different regions: the end portions maintain high strength for pole impacts, while the central portion allows controlled deformation for barrier crashes, enabling the beam to absorb energy effectively in both scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If the web height is reduced towards the center to improve energy absorption, then the beam yields better in barrier crashes, but it becomes weaker and more prone to local buckling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidresistance to local buckling
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The web height parameter is varied along the length of the bumper beam, creating a gradient structure where the central portion has reduced height (allowing deformation) while the end portions maintain full height (providing strength). This parameter change enables the beam to exhibit different mechanical behaviors in different regions, balancing energy absorption with buckling resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the bumper beam has a uniform strong structure, then it withstands thin pole impacts, but it creates high moment at midspan and buckles when hit close to the vehicle center

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to pole impactVSAvoidresistance to midspan buckling
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper beam features variable web height along its length, with the central portion having a reduced web height compared to the end portions. This creates different structural characteristics in different regions: the end portions maintain high strength for pole impacts, while the central portion allows controlled deformation for barrier crashes, enabling the beam to absorb energy effectively in both scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1888376B1A bumper beam
Publication Date: 2011.02.02 GESTAMP HARDTECH AB
  • EP1888376B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1888376B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1888376B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A bow-formed bumper beam for a vehicle has a hat profile with a central flange (11), two webs (12,13), and side flanges (14,15). The beam has fastening portions (20,21) at its sides where the side flanges form fastening areas (30-33) for fastening the beam to the vehicle with the central flange facing outwards. The profile height of the beam decreases continuously from the fastening portions towards the centre so that the profile height is less than two third of the highest profile height at the fastening portions. The central flange is wider at its centre than at its fastening portions and has a stiffener in the form of an elongate depression (16) that extends from the centre of the beam towards the fastening portions. In the area between the fastening portions, the side flanges have bent edges (26,27) and in association with the beginning of the bent edges, the side flanges have transverse dents.