Bowfishing Arrow Locking Pin Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bowfishing arrows require complex and cumbersome procedures to remove the fish point from the fish after landing, often resulting in injury and inefficiency, as they need to be forced through the fish or have barbs reversed, which is difficult and time-consuming, especially when the fish is struggling.

Innovation Solution

A bowfishing arrow design featuring a movable outer sleeve and slidable locking pin mechanism that allows the barbs to lock and unlock, enabling the arrow to be easily removed from the fish using one hand without forcing the fish point through the fish, utilizing a coil spring and alignment peg to facilitate the barb position change.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fish points with fixed barbs are used to hold the fish securely, then the fish is held firmly during retrieval, but the arrow cannot be easily removed from the fish without forcing it through or mutilating the fish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefish holding securityVSAvoidarrow removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barbs are made movable rather than fixed, allowing them to transition between an engaged position (holding the fish securely) and a retracted position (allowing easy arrow removal). The spring mechanism enables the barbs to dynamically adjust their state based on operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fish point is divided into separable components: the barbs can be independently moved relative to the shaft through the slot mechanism, allowing the barbs to be engaged or disengaged from the fish without moving the entire arrow through the fish body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the arrow is forced through the fish to remove the fish point, then the arrow can be removed from the fish, but the fish flesh is torn and mutilated in the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrow removal easeVSAvoidfish flesh damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barbs are extracted from the fixed structure and made movable through the slot mechanism, allowing them to be separated from the fish without forcing the entire arrow through the fish body. This eliminates the harmful effect of tearing fish flesh during arrow removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If the barbs are reversed or collapsed to remove the arrow from the fish, then the arrow can be pulled back through the fish, but this requires the bowfisherman to set down the bow and use both hands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrow removal easeVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring mechanism automatically returns the barbs to their retracted position after the arrow penetrates the fish, eliminating the need for manual intervention to collapse or reverse the barbs. This allows one-handed operation throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The barbs automatically transition between engaged and retracted states through the spring mechanism, eliminating the need for complex manual operations to change barb configuration. The system self-adjusts based on the operational phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If the fish point must be removed from the end of the arrow to retrieve the arrow, then the arrow can be easily removed from the fish, but this requires the arrow to penetrate all the way through the fish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrow removal easeVSAvoidfish body penetration requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barbs are extracted from the fixed structure and made movable through the slot mechanism, allowing them to be separated from the fish without forcing the entire arrow through the fish body. This eliminates the harmful effect of tearing fish flesh during arrow removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick and safe removal of the arrow from the fish using a one-handed maneuver, reducing the risk of injury and time consumption, while maintaining a secure hold on the fish during retrieval.

Implementation Method 1

coil spring and alignment peg to facilitate the barb position change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9980472B2Bowfishing arrow
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 HARSHBERGER DAVID R
  • US9980472B2 patent drawing
  • US9980472B2 patent drawing
  • US9980472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bowfishing arrow and method of bowfishing. The bowfishing arrow includes a shaft having a main stem. A locking pin is slidably movable within a bore of the main stem. A fish point with a pair of pivoting barbs is secured to the distal end of the main stem. An outer sleeve is longitudinally movable with respect to the main stem and the locking pin is engaged with the outer sleeve to move with the outer sleeve. The barbs pivot between a shooting position, a locked position, and an unlocked position. When in the locked position, an end of the locking pin is clamped between cams preventing the barbs from pivoting to toward the unlocked position and the shooting position until the fish is landed. A one-handed maneuver is all that is required to release the arrow from the fish after it is landed.