Box Nut Retainer Structure for Thin-Panel Anti-Rattle Clamping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing box nut retainer systems fail to securely engage relatively thin panels, leading to misalignment, rattling noises, and wear due to relative movement between the retainer and the panel.

Innovation Solution

The box nut retainer system features a support with opposing wings and a fastener sleeve that engages with the panel's top and bottom surfaces, utilizing snap arms and tabs to securely clamp the retainer in place, preventing movement and ensuring tight engagement with the panel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional box nut retainer is used to fasten panels, then the fastening function is achieved, but the retainer does not tightly engage relatively thin panels, leading to misalignment, rattling noises, and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement stabilityVSAvoidrelative movement between retainer and panel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer engages the panel in multiple dimensions: the body engages the rear surface, while the tabs extend forward to engage the front surface. This multi-dimensional engagement eliminates relative movement between the retainer and thin panel, preventing misalignment, rattling noises, and wear while maintaining secure fastening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of moving object

If the panel thickness is reduced to use thinner, lighter panels, then vehicle weight is reduced and fuel efficiency is improved, but the retainer cannot securely engage the thin panel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel weightVSAvoidretainer engagement security
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer transitions from single-surface engagement to multi-surface engagement by extending tabs from the body to reach the front surface of thin panels. This allows secure engagement of lightweight thin panels without compromising fastening reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If the retainer structure is simplified for ease of manufacture, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but the retainer lacks the complexity needed to securely engage thin panels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretainer manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpanel engagement security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is segmented into a body portion and tab portions that can be formed as integral structures. This segmentation allows the complex multi-surface engagement function to be achieved while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through potential one-piece forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer body and tabs work together as a unified multi-functional component: the body provides structural support and engages the rear surface, while the tabs extend to engage the front surface. This multi-functionality secures thin panels without requiring multiple separate components, maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3783232B1Box nut retainer
Publication Date: 2023.10.04 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP3783232B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3783232B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3783232B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A first example box nut retainer includes a support (102), a fastener sleeve (106) , and a wing (110). The fastener sleeve defines an opening (116) and extends downwardly from the support. The wing extends from the support and has a top corner between the support and the fastener sleeve.