Box Tray Assembly With Programmable Positioning for Automated Sortation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated sortation systems in distribution centers are inefficient and inflexible, relying heavily on human labor and mechanical complexity, which increases costs and limits throughput due to the need for numerous diverts and collection bins, and fail to efficiently match objects with assigned bins.

Innovation Solution

A box handling system with programmable motion control and identifying indicia on box trays and covers, allowing for precise identification and sorting of objects into appropriate collection bins using robotic systems and conveyors, enabling efficient alignment and processing of objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If tilt-tray or bomb-bay style recirculating conveyors with actuators are used for each divert, then automated sortation capability is achieved, but mechanical complexity and cost per divert increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sortation capabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the sortation function into two independent segments: (1) a single actuator that controls box tray positioning, and (2) passive gravity-based object release at multiple divert locations. This eliminates the need for actuators at each divert point while maintaining automated sortation capability across hundreds of destinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The box tray assembly acts as an intermediary carrier that holds the object and transports it to the correct divert location. The tray itself becomes the sorting mechanism through its programmable positioning, rather than requiring active control mechanisms at each destination point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If numerous collection bins are arranged within reach of human workers, then sortation functionality is provided, but physical space requirements and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation functionalityVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a two-dimensional arrangement where all bins must be within arm's reach of workers, to a three-dimensional recirculating conveyor system where bins can be distributed along the conveyor path. Objects are sorted by position along the conveyor rather than by proximity to a fixed work station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The recirculating conveyor system serves multiple functions: it transports objects to numerous divert locations, provides recirculation for missed sorts, and accommodates dynamic bin assignments. A single conveyor infrastructure supports hundreds of diverts without requiring proportional increases in worker reach area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If human workers perform manual sortation, then flexibility in handling various objects is maintained, but throughput is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human manual sortation with an automated control system that uses scanners, processors, and programmable box tray positioning to identify and route objects. This mechanical-to-automated substitution maintains flexibility through programmable logic while dramatically increasing throughput beyond human capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic bin assignments where collection bin mappings are not fixed but can be changed programmatically. The box tray positions and bin assignments are dynamically adjusted based on real-time sortation requirements, providing adaptability equivalent to human workers with automated speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If the number of diverts is increased to match more collection bins, then sortation precision improves, but the cost per divert increases due to additional actuators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation precisionVSAvoidcost per divert
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sorting function so that precision is achieved through programmable positioning of a single actuator-controlled box tray, rather than through multiple actuators. Each divert location benefits from the precision positioning capability without requiring its own expensive actuator mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of physically replicating actuator mechanisms at each divert location, the system uses a single actuator that is programmatically controlled to serve multiple divert positions. The control system creates virtual copies of the sorting function for each destination, eliminating the need for physical hardware replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11673255B2Systems and methods for dynamic processing of objects using box tray assemblies
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US11673255B2 patent drawing
  • US11673255B2 patent drawing
  • US11673255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A box handling system is disclosed for use in an object processing system. The box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box, and the recessed area includes a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box that contains objects to be processed.