Brain Circuit Model Simulation for Personalized Therapeutic Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the optimal location and type of brain therapeutic interventions, such as pharmaceutical therapy injections and deep brain stimulation, are limited by trial-and-error approaches and lack personalization, making it difficult to effectively treat neurological conditions like Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a brain circuit model simulation based on receptor expression levels from medical imaging data to predict therapeutic effects, allowing for the ranking of treatment approaches and determining optimal locations and types of interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If trial-and-error approaches are used to determine optimal brain therapeutic interventions, then treatment effectiveness can be achieved, but the process is time-consuming and lacks personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidtime for treatment determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating a virtual circuit model of the patient's brain before actual treatment. The model is parameterized using pre-treatment imaging data (PET, MRI, fMRI) to simulate brain circuit behavior and predict therapeutic responses in advance, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial-and-error approaches during treatment determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy (digital twin) of the patient's brain circuitry through computational modeling. This virtual model replicates the biological brain's neural circuits and can be manipulated computationally to predict treatment outcomes, replacing the need for physical trial-and-error interventions on the actual patient brain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If trial-and-error approaches are used for brain therapeutic interventions, then treatment can be applied, but personalization to individual patient needs is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by creating a personalized circuit model that captures region-specific characteristics of each patient's brain. The model incorporates patient-specific imaging data (PET for receptor binding, MRI for anatomy, fMRI for connectivity) to simulate local circuit behavior in different brain regions, enabling tailored treatment recommendations for each patient's unique neurological profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by adjusting model parameters based on individual patient imaging data. The circuit model is parameterized using patient-specific values for receptor binding affinities, neural connectivity strengths, and circuit activation patterns, allowing the simulation to predict how different treatments would affect each patient's unique brain circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional treatment planning methods are used, then treatments can be administered, but accuracy in determining optimal treatment location and type is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment administrationVSAvoidtreatment planning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing simulated treatment outcomes with actual patient responses. The circuit model incorporates feedback loops that adjust predictions based on observed therapeutic effects, allowing iterative refinement of treatment recommendations and improving accuracy over time as patient response data becomes available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical trial-and-error treatment approaches with computational simulation. Instead of physically testing multiple treatment options on the patient, the system uses computer-based circuit modeling to virtually test and rank treatment approaches, providing precise predictions about optimal treatment location, type, and dosage before actual administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12100515B2Altering a targeted brain therapeutic based on a brain circuit model
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12100515B2 patent drawing
  • US12100515B2 patent drawing
  • US12100515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques that facilitate altering a targeted brain therapeutic are provided. In one example, a system determines parameter data associated with a circuit model of a biological brain. The system also simulates the circuit model based on the parameter data to generate treatment data associated with the biological brain.