Brain Computer Interface Signal Detection Using Pseudo-Random Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brain-computer interface (BCI) systems face challenges in reliably detecting mental processing of stimuli due to interference from noise and complexity in signal analysis, particularly in distinguishing stimulus-related activity from spontaneous brain oscillations.

Innovation Solution

The method employs pseudo-random noise components as stimuli tags, which are correlated with brain wave signals to enhance detection robustness, using spread spectrum techniques to distribute power across a wide frequency range, and orthogonal Golden codes to minimize interference, allowing for reliable tracking of mental processing and selective attention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional stimulus detection methods are used in BCI systems, then the system structure remains simple, but the reliability of stimulus detection deteriorates due to noise interference and difficulty in distinguishing stimulus-related activity from spontaneous brain oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of stimulus detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of signal processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces pseudo-random noise components as intermediary tags that are embedded in stimuli and correlated with brain wave signals. These tags act as mediators between the stimulus and the detection system, enabling reliable identification of stimulus-related neural responses even in the presence of spontaneous brain oscillations and noise. The correlation process selectively amplifies tagged stimulus responses while suppressing uncorrelated background activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the detection approach by changing the parameter space from direct signal amplitude analysis to correlation-based detection in the frequency domain. By spreading the stimulus tag power across a wide frequency range using pseudo-random noise sequences, the system can detect stimuli through correlation peaks that stand out against the background noise spectrum, significantly improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If spread spectrum techniques with pseudo-random noise components are used to tag stimuli, then the reliability and robustness of stimulus detection improves, but the complexity of signal processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of stimulus detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of correlation processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-generating and storing the pseudo-random noise tag sequences that will be used to modulate stimuli. These tag sequences are prepared in advance and made available for correlation processing, allowing the detection system to efficiently identify stimulus responses without requiring complex real-time analysis. The pre-computed tags enable rapid correlation-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional time-domain signal analysis methods with frequency-domain correlation processing. Instead of manually analyzing complex time-varying brain wave signals for stimulus responses, the system uses automated correlation computation in the frequency domain, which efficiently separates stimulus-related activity from background oscillations through spectral matching with the pseudo-random noise tags.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If correlation analysis with pseudo-random noise tags is applied to brain wave signals, then the ability to distinguish stimulus-related activity from background noise improves, but the computational requirements and data processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of mental processing detectionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action through the use of pseudo-random noise sequences with known statistical properties and repeating patterns. These periodic tag sequences allow the correlation process to accumulate signal energy over multiple stimulus presentations, improving measurement precision through averaging while maintaining computational efficiency. The periodic structure enables systematic processing of brain wave data across multiple trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing correlation analysis only on specific frequency bands and time windows where stimulus-related activity is expected, rather than processing the entire brain wave spectrum. This selective approach reduces computational load while maintaining high measurement precision for the relevant neural responses, avoiding unnecessary computation on unrelated frequency ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9084549B2Method for processing a brain wave signal and brain computer interface
Publication Date: 2015.07.21 MINDAFFECT BV
  • US9084549B2 patent drawing
  • US9084549B2 patent drawing
  • US9084549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and brain computer interface for processing a brain wave signal of a subject using a brain wave detector. One or more stimuli are applied to the subject which each include a pseudo random noise component. The brain wave signal is detected and mental processing of the one or more stimuli is tracked by correlating the pseudo random noise component and the brain wave signal.