Shape Graph Mapping of Brain Dynamics Without Dimensionality Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuroimaging methods, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), struggle with clinical translation due to low signal-to-noise ratios and methodological issues, leading to group-averaged tendencies rather than individual-level insights, and face computational inefficiencies in scaling up to larger datasets.

Innovation Solution

The use of a methodological framework that constructs shape graphs from neuroimaging data by leveraging topological data analysis (TDA) techniques, specifically Mapper, with improvements such as intrinsic binning and reciprocal k-nearest neighbors (kNN) graphs, to capture high-dimensional geometry and reduce computational costs, while avoiding dimensionality reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional neuroimaging analyses (GLM or functional connectivity) are used, then group-averaged tendencies can be obtained, but individual-level insights are lost due to low signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidindividual-level insights
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the high-dimensional neuroimaging data into manageable components through shape graph construction, where nodes represent brain states and edges represent transitions. This segmentation allows individual-level patterns to be extracted without being overwhelmed by noise, enabling both precise measurement and preservation of individual characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the data from traditional dimensional spaces into a shape graph dimensionality where topological features (nodes, edges, connectivity patterns) become the analytical units. This dimensional transformation allows individual-level insights to be captured through graph-theoretical metrics while improving signal-to-noise ratio through topological aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If computational methods are scaled up to larger datasets, then more comprehensive brain dynamics can be mapped, but computational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedataset sizeVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts essential topological features (shape graph structure) from the full neuroimaging dataset, separating the critical information needed for analysis from the redundant data. This extraction allows comprehensive brain dynamics to be mapped using only the essential structural features, maintaining computational efficiency even as dataset size increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analytical parameters from traditional voxel-wise or region-wise statistics to shape graph topological parameters (node degrees, betweenness centrality, community structure). This parameter transformation enables scaling to larger datasets because graph-theoretical metrics aggregate information across the entire brain, reducing computational complexity while preserving comprehensive dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If dimensionality reduction is applied to neuroimaging data, then computational costs are reduced, but high-dimensional geometry information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidhigh-dimensional geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of reducing dimensions through projection, the patent transitions to a graph-theoretical dimensionality where the high-dimensional geometry is preserved as topological structure. The shape graph maintains the intrinsic geometry of brain state space by representing distances and connections directly, avoiding information loss while improving computational tractability through graph algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12548658B2Systems and methods for scalable mapping of brain dynamics
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US12548658B2 patent drawing
  • US12548658B2 patent drawing
  • US12548658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for scalable mapping of brain dynamics are capable of mapping brain dynamics in a computationally efficient way. Shape graphs can be produced which can operate as interactive network representations of dynamic brain activity data. In methods for automatically interpreting the structure of the shape graphs, the mapped brain dynamics can be used to indicate which type of treatment protocol is likely to be most effective for the particular individual. The treatment can include transcranial magnetic stimulation, pharmaceutical treatment, and/or any other mental condition treatment as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications.