Anatomical Landmark Identification via MRI Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical procedures, particularly in neurosurgery, face challenges in identifying anatomical landmarks in the brain that are visually indistinguishable from surrounding tissue, making it difficult to accurately locate functional targets like the sub-thalamic nucleus for treatments such as deep brain stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-assisted surgical system that uses imaging techniques like MRI to identify anatomical landmarks, segment and align image data, and determine trajectories to reach specific targets in the brain, combining automatic and manual inputs to enhance precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual examination of brain anatomy is performed by skilled physicians, then surgical procedures can be performed based on training and experience, but anatomical landmarks that are visually indistinguishable from surrounding tissue cannot be accurately identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracy of anatomical landmarksVSAvoidvisual distinguishability of anatomical landmarks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces image processing algorithms and computational models as intermediaries between the raw MRI data and the anatomical landmarks. These algorithms automatically detect and identify landmarks by analyzing image intensity patterns, edges, and anatomical relationships, serving as a mediator that bridges the gap between visual data and precise landmark identification when direct visual distinction is impossible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/visual examination system (physician visual inspection) with an automated image processing system. Instead of relying on human visual capabilities to distinguish anatomical landmarks, the system uses computational algorithms including edge detection, intensity thresholding, and anatomical relationship analysis to automatically identify landmarks that are visually indistinguishable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated image processing is used to identify anatomical landmarks, then objective and standardized identification can be achieved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity and standardization of landmark identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of image processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing task into distinct modular components: preprocessing (noise reduction, intensity normalization), feature extraction (edge detection, intensity profile analysis), landmark identification (coordinate determination based on extracted features), and validation (anatomical relationship verification). Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable and reliable through division of labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions on the MRI data before landmark identification, including noise reduction filtering, intensity normalization, and enhancement of anatomical features. These preliminary processing steps prepare the data in advance, making subsequent landmark detection more reliable and reducing the complexity of the identification algorithms by providing pre-processed, optimized input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual identification of anatomical landmarks is performed, then flexibility in handling various anatomical variations can be maintained, but procedural time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedural time for landmark identificationVSAvoidflexibility in handling anatomical variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs adjustable parameters within the image processing algorithms to accommodate anatomical variations. By changing parameters such as intensity thresholds, edge detection sensitivity, and anatomical relationship criteria, the system can adapt to different patient anatomies without requiring manual reconfiguration, thus maintaining flexibility while automating the process for improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3298968B1Method for identification of anatomical landmarks
Publication Date: 2021.03.03 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP3298968B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3298968B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3298968B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4C

AI summary

A method for determining an anatomical landmark of a brain includes determining a first region in image data of the brain by segmenting the image data, aligning slices of the image data based on the first region, determining a skeletonized line in the determined first region, and extracting a mid-sagittal plane based upon a sagittal plane formed by the plurality of skeleton lines in the plurality of slices. The anatomical landmarks can be used to determine anatomical targets of a patient.