Brain Metabolism Mapping Using MRI-dPET Co-Registration and MCIF

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Analyzing medical images, particularly FDG-PET scans, is labor-intensive and requires specialized training, limiting the speed and accuracy of medical diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning techniques, including 3D-CNN and RNN, to co-register MRI and dPET data, segment anatomical portions, and calculate a model-corrected input function (MCIF) for precise metabolic mapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual analysis of medical images is performed by trained individuals, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service analysis where the AI model independently processes medical images, performs segmentation, and generates diagnostic reports without requiring manual intervention from trained professionals, thereby maintaining accuracy while improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual image analysis by trained individuals with an automated AI-based system that uses machine learning algorithms to perform the same diagnostic functions, eliminating labor-intensive manual operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated analysis methods are implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic efficiencyVSAvoiddiagnostic accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI model's outputs are continuously refined based on performance metrics and validation results, ensuring that automated analysis maintains high diagnostic accuracy while improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by training the AI model extensively on labeled datasets before deployment, pre-establishing accurate patterns and relationships that enable the system to maintain high diagnostic precision during automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If complex machine learning models are used, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex analysis task into distinct modular components including image preprocessing, feature extraction, segmentation, and validation stages, each handled by specialized model components that can be independently optimized and maintained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260073515A1Method and system for automated parametric mapping of brain metabolism
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 UNIV OF VIRGINIA LICENSING & VENTURES GRP
  • US20260073515A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073515A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073515A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Digital images are used for time-based mapping of metabolic activity within a selected anatomy of a subject, particularly within a brain of the subject. Machine learning algorithms receive magnetic resonance image (MRI) data and four-dimensional dynamic positron emission tomography (dPET) data of the brain. A tracer may be applied prior to the anatomical scanning, and the MRI data is co-registered with the dPET data. A convolutional neural network (CNN) outputs localized data frames and a probability distribution for respective localized data frames. The probability distribution corresponds to a section of the subject's anatomy, such as internal carotid arteries, being visible in each of the respective localized data frames. The chosen section of the anatomy is segmented from the visible frames and a model-corrected input function (MCIF) for blood flow is calculated to compute a Ki map that illustrates influx of the tracer into the preferred anatomical portion.