Brain Signal-Guided Implantable Medical Device Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical device implantation and configuration for electrical stimulation therapy rely heavily on patient feedback, which can be inaccurate and time-consuming, making it challenging to achieve precise electrode placement and stimulation parameter selection.

Innovation Solution

The use of brain signal sensing to facilitate the configuration of medical devices, allowing for real-time monitoring and adjustment of electrical stimulation or drug delivery based on sensed brain signals, either through external or implantable devices, to improve efficacy and precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If patient feedback is used to configure electrical stimulation therapy, then the device can be operated with simple feedback mechanisms, but the accuracy and reliability of electrode placement and parameter selection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of feedback mechanismVSAvoidaccuracy of electrode placement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where brain signals are continuously monitored and used to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. The system detects brain responses to stimulation and uses this feedback to optimize electrode placement and parameter selection, resolving the contradiction by providing both automatic precision and operational simplicity through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically detecting brain signals and adjusting stimulation parameters without requiring manual intervention. The device serves itself by using its own output (stimulation) to generate feedback signals that automatically tune the therapy, eliminating the need for complex manual configuration while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If patient feedback is used to configure electrical stimulation therapy, then the operation remains manual, but the time required for configuration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration automatically during the implantation procedure by testing multiple electrode combinations and pre-optimizing parameters before the device is fully implanted. This preliminary action eliminates the need for time-consuming manual configuration afterward, while the device remains operable through simple user interface for later adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time brain signal feedback during the implantation procedure enables automatic parameter optimization while the device is still accessible. The system uses immediate feedback from brain responses to rapidly converge on optimal settings, dramatically reducing configuration time compared to traditional manual trial-and-error methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual parameter selection is used, then the device structure remains simple, but the reliability of therapy efficacy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of device structureVSAvoidtherapy efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates brain signal sensing and automatic parameter adjustment feedback loops that significantly improve therapy efficacy reliability. The system continuously monitors brain responses and automatically optimizes stimulation parameters, ensuring consistent therapeutic effectiveness while adding only moderate complexity through integrated sensing and control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical parameter adjustment with automated electronic control based on brain signal analysis. This substitution uses electronic sensing and digital signal processing to achieve more reliable and precise parameter optimization than manual methods, while the added complexity is managed through standardized electronic components and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8185207B2Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals
Publication Date: 2012.05.22 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US8185207B2 patent drawing
  • US8185207B2 patent drawing
  • US8185207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is directed to techniques and systems in which external brain monitoring is used to facilitate implantation and configuration of an implantable medical device. The techniques may create an open loop or closed loop system in which brain signals quantify the efficacy of electrical logical stimulation (or drug therapy via an implantable drug pump) at locations outside of the brain. The techniques may be used to improve placement of leads and electrodes during an implantation procedure, and/or to select or adjust stimulation parameters either during the implantation procedure or possibly following implantation of an implantable medical device. The described techniques have applications for the alleviation of pain, but may find other applications where EEG signals can quantify the efficacy of treatment via an implantable medical device.