Brain State Prediction for Personalized Non-Invasive Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack comprehensive understanding and predictive models of brain function, particularly in response to external and internal perturbations, and there is limited capability to simulate and optimize brain states for cognitive enhancement or disease management.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing data analysis, neuromodulation, and AI algorithms to map, characterize, and predict brain function, enabling non-invasive brain stimulation to change brain states, and create personalized digital content and interventions based on individual brain metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive brain mapping and predictive modeling are implemented, then understanding of brain function improves, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain function measurementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex brain mapping system into multiple specialized modules: data acquisition module for collecting neural signals, data processing module for cleaning and organizing data, analysis module for extracting brain metrics, and predictive modeling module for simulating brain states. This segmentation allows each module to handle specific tasks efficiently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces digital twins as intermediary computational models that simulate individual brain states and responses to interventions. These digital twins act as mediators between complex raw brain data and actionable insights, allowing researchers to predict brain responses without directly manipulating actual brains, thereby simplifying the experimental process while improving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If personalized brain stimulation protocols are developed, then cognitive enhancement effectiveness improves, but individual assessment and protocol customization time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecognitive enhancement effectivenessVSAvoidassessment and customization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary brain mapping and digital twin creation for each individual before cognitive enhancement interventions begin. This preliminary assessment establishes baseline brain states and predictive models that automatically guide subsequent stimulation protocols, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial-and-error customization during actual treatment and ensuring high effectiveness from the first intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates continuous feedback loops where brain activity during stimulation is monitored in real-time, and the digital twin model is updated accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust stimulation parameters based on individual responses, maintaining high effectiveness while minimizing manual intervention time and enabling rapid protocol optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If real-time brain state monitoring and prediction is implemented, then intervention optimization improves, but computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervention optimizationVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial real-time monitoring by continuously tracking only the most relevant brain metrics that have the greatest impact on intervention effectiveness, while periodically updating less critical parameters. This selective monitoring approach maintains high intervention optimization capability by focusing computational resources on critical metrics, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260112487A1Systems and methods to measure, predict and optimize brain function
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 HORIZON NEUROSCIENCES LLC
  • US20260112487A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112487A1 patent drawing
  • US20260112487A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for changing a brain state of a person from an initial brain state to a target brain state are described. The method includes receiving information characterizing the initial brain state, the information including a structural composition and a functional architecture of the brain, estimating based, at least in part, on the received information, a potential for the brain to change from the initial brain state to the target brain state, determining based, at least in part, on the received information and the estimated potential for the brain to change from the initial brain state to the target brain state, a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol, and controlling at least one non-invasive brain stimulation device to stimulate the brain according to the non-invasive brain stimulation protocol. The method also includes using brain information to inform the design of computational general artificial intelligence agents.