Brain State Modeling for Real-Time Trading Decision Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved methods and systems to harness the relationship between brain states and performance across various fields, particularly in enhancing decision-making and productivity, as existing technologies have limitations in characterizing and recognizing physiological states that correlate with performance levels, and there is a lack of effective data-based intervention and training programs for accelerated learning.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method involving monitoring brain states through neurometric interfaces, transforming signals into scores, and using machine learning systems to analyze and adjust financial transactions based on brain state thresholds, along with feedback mechanisms to enhance performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If brain state monitoring and analysis systems are implemented to improve decision-making, then decision quality and productivity are improved, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments brain state monitoring into distinct functional modules: neurometric interface for signal acquisition, machine learning system for pattern recognition, and feedback mechanism for intervention. This modular architecture reduces overall system complexity by making each component independently manageable while maintaining the integrated benefit of improved decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning system as an intermediary layer between raw brain state signals and decision-making processes. This intermediary translates complex neural data into actionable insights, reducing the complexity burden on both the hardware interface and the human user while preserving productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If comprehensive brain state data collection and analysis are performed, then performance optimization is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models on extensive brain state datasets before actual use. This pre-processing creates ready-to-use predictive models that can quickly analyze real-time brain states without requiring extensive computation during critical decision moments, thus optimizing performance while minimizing processing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selectively monitoring and analyzing only those brain state parameters that have been identified as most predictive of performance outcomes. Rather than processing all possible neural data, the system focuses on key indicators, reducing computational burden while maintaining effective performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If real-time brain state feedback is provided to traders, then trading performance is improved, but system reliability and stability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading performanceVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements controlled feedback mechanisms that provide traders with brain state information in a structured, interpretable format. This feedback is designed to enhance trader awareness and performance without creating system instability, as the feedback loop is carefully regulated to prevent overreaction or misinterpretation that could compromise reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the sensitivity and threshold levels of brain state detection based on market conditions and individual trader characteristics. This adaptability allows the system to maintain high trading performance while preserving stability by preventing extreme or inappropriate feedback responses under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12511691B2Optimization of trading performance using both brain state models and operational performance models
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 OPTIOS INC
  • US12511691B2 patent drawing
  • US12511691B2 patent drawing
  • US12511691B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes generating a trading performance model for a trading activity involving a set of decisions by a set of expert traders. The trading performance model includes a set of input data sets, a set of data processing workflows operating on the input data sets, and a set of trading decision outputs resulting from interaction of the expert traders with a user interface representing the trading performance model. The method includes generating a brain state model representing a sequential set of brain states of the set of expert traders that characterize brain states measured during the interactions of the expert traders with the user interface representing the trading performance model, assessing the quality of the trading decisions, determining a preferred pattern of trader brain state sequences, and modifying a subsequent trading activity.