Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation via Biomarker Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brain stimulation therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), face challenges in effectively delivering targeted electrical stimulation to manage neurological disorders like Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease, as they often rely on empirical methods without precise biomarker-driven adjustments.

Innovation Solution

The method involves implanting electrodes in the brain to deliver electrical stimulation at specific frequencies, detecting evoked potential peaks and biomarkers in bioelectrical responses, and adjusting stimulation parameters based on these markers to provide therapeutic effects, either inhibitory or excitatory, to specific brain regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If empirical methods are used for brain stimulation therapy, then the therapy can be delivered without complex biomarker detection systems, but the precision and effectiveness of treatment is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomarker detection precisionVSAvoidstimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects biomarkers (evoked potential peaks) in real-time and uses this feedback to automatically adjust stimulation parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that improves treatment precision without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The stimulation system performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting biomarkers and modifying its own stimulation parameters based on the detected neural response, eliminating the need for external monitoring and manual parameter tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed frequency stimulation is used, then the stimulation delivery is simple and consistent, but the therapy cannot be optimized for individual patient responses or varying brain states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation parameter adaptabilityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed-frequency stimulation to dynamic adaptive stimulation, where stimulation parameters continuously adjust based on real-time biomarker detection and neural response monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies stimulation parameters (frequency, intensity, pulse width) based on detected evoked potential peaks and biomarkers, optimizing therapy for individual patient responses without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If low frequency stimulation is used for biomarker detection, then the evoked potential peaks can be clearly detected, but the therapeutic effect is reduced compared to higher frequency stimulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevoked potential detection accuracyVSAvoidtherapeutic effect reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic low-frequency stimulation pulses specifically for biomarker detection phases, then transitions to higher-frequency therapeutic stimulation, utilizing the temporal separation of detection and treatment functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The low-frequency stimulation serves as an intermediary tool for biomarker detection, enabling the system to identify optimal therapeutic parameters before delivering the actual high-frequency therapeutic stimulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more precise and effective management of neurological symptoms by optimizing stimulation parameters based on real-time bioelectrical brain activity, enhancing therapeutic outcomes such as memory recall, cognitive function, and mood regulation.

Implementation Method 1

providing, via at least one electrode implanted in a brain of a patient, electrical stimulation at a low frequency to a stimulation site within a white matter tract of the patient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

the biomarker comprising oscillation in the bioelectrical response at a frequency that is one of a sub-harmonic frequency of the specific stimulation frequency or a physiologically driven frequency different from the specific stimulation frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural oscillation: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS11925806B2Brain stimulation therapy
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US11925806B2 patent drawing
  • US11925806B2 patent drawing
  • US11925806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrodes are positioned within (or adjacent to) white matter fiber tracts in a brain of patient. The DBS electrodes may be positioned near one or more stimulation sites within the white matter fiber tracts. The stimulation sites may be selected based on the disorder of the patient. In some examples, the stimulation sites may be selected based on one or more symptoms of the patient. In some examples, additional electrodes may be positioned in another area to collect bioelectrical brain signals. The area in which the additional electrodes are placed is an area that is different from the stimulation site but is targeted by stimulation therapy provided at the stimulation site.