Brainstem Response Analysis Using Cellular Variance Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current auditory brainstem response methods are time-consuming and lack real-time analysis capabilities, making it difficult to assess the effects of psychoactive compounds and substances on brainstem disorders without relying on cognitive effort from subjects and requiring specific positioning of devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that determine cellular variance and volatility of evoked brain responses to sound stimuli, allowing for real-time analysis of brainstem responses without needing to position devices specifically on neurons, using sound pulses or clicks to evoke responses and calculate average signals for comparison.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional auditory brainstem response methods are used for diagnosis, then data can be obtained for comparison with normal healthy subjects, but the assessment is time-consuming and cannot be performed in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and analyzing brainstem responses in real-time, establishing baseline data and detecting changes as they occur rather than waiting for complete traditional assessments. This allows early detection of psychoactive compound effects and reduces diagnostic time while maintaining accuracy through continuous real-time analysis of evoked responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical assessment methods with automated computational analysis of brainstem responses. By using computer-based processing to analyze evoked responses and detect cellular variance patterns, the system eliminates time-consuming manual assessments while maintaining diagnostic precision through algorithmic comparison with established baseline data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If surgically implanted arrays of electrodes are used to record signals, then neuronal activity can be measured, but the procedure is invasive and requires specific positioning on chosen brain structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneuronal activity detectionVSAvoidelectrode positioning requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses non-invasive recording electrodes that can detect brainstem responses from multiple locations without requiring surgical implantation or precise positioning on specific neurons. The method universally applies to various brainstem structures and can assess responses from different neural pathways using the same external recording setup, eliminating the need for structure-specific electrode placement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using external recording electrodes that capture brainstem responses through the scalp and skull, rather than directly contacting neural tissue. This intermediary method allows measurement of neuronal activity without invasive procedures, eliminating the complexity of surgical electrode implantation while maintaining the ability to detect evoked responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If Post-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) is used to determine stimulus induced activity, then activity in a certain chosen structure can be analyzed, but it cannot determine activity in several parts of the brain simultaneously and requires cognitive effort from the subject

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulus induced activity measurementVSAvoidsubject cognitive effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis into multiple time windows corresponding to different brainstem structures and response components. By dividing the evoked response into distinct temporal and spatial segments, the method can simultaneously analyze activity from multiple brain regions without requiring the subject to perform cognitive tasks, as each segment is automatically identified and processed by the computational system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces PSTH methodology with automated computational analysis that detects stimulus-induced activity patterns without requiring subject cognitive participation. The system uses algorithmic processing to identify and measure evoked responses across multiple brainstem structures simultaneously, eliminating the need for subject cooperation while providing comprehensive multi-regional analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10098562B2System and method for improved determination of a brain response state
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 SENSODETECT
  • US10098562B2 patent drawing
  • US10098562B2 patent drawing
  • US10098562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and a method for detecting a brain response state of a subject id disclosed. The detection comprises repeatedly presenting the subject with a sound stimulus for evoking a brain response. Detecting the evoked brain response signal related to each of said sound stimulus. Determining a window having a time width covering at least partly an area of at least one neuron's evoked response in the brain response signal. Calculating an average response signal over the window and comparing the at least one neuron's evoked response with the average response signal for determining a cellular variance and/or volatility.