Brain-Wave Access Control for Hazard Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The general public's stress and lack of balance between personal and work life lead to harmful habits, such as accessing potentially dangerous situations, which traditional methods have failed to prevent effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses detected brain-wave patterns in combination with user motion to control access to hazardous environments through a network of electronic devices, disabling access when harmful patterns are detected and enabling it only after correct authentication through pre-defined questions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional access control methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of preventing harmful access deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of preventing harmful accessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensing technologies (brain wave detection via EEG, motion detection via accelerometers, and environmental sensors) into an integrated access control system. This merging of multiple detection modalities enhances the reliability of preventing harmful access by cross-validating multiple data sources, while the system manages complexity through unified processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The access control system is designed with multi-functionality, serving multiple purposes: it detects user mental state through brain waves, monitors physical motion, identifies environmental hazards, and controls access to restricted areas. This universal approach consolidates multiple separate systems into one integrated solution, improving reliability while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If brain-wave pattern detection is used to control access, then reliability of preventing harmful access is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of preventing harmful accessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the access control function into independent modules: brain wave detection module, motion detection module, hazard identification module, and access control module. Each module processes specific data independently and contributes to the overall decision. This segmentation reduces the complexity burden on any single component while maintaining high reliability through modular cooperation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that receives raw data from multiple sensors (EEG signals, motion data, environmental readings) and transforms them into meaningful access control decisions. This intermediary layer simplifies the interaction between complex sensor systems and the access control logic, managing complexity while preserving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to detect user state and environment, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing specific sensors in locations where they provide maximum information value: EEG sensors on the user's head for brain wave detection, motion sensors near access points for detecting user movement, and environmental sensors positioned to detect hazards. Each sensor is strategically positioned to measure specific parameters locally, improving measurement precision without requiring uniform distribution of all sensor types throughout the environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents users from entering dangerous situations by accurately linking brain activity with environmental hazards, ensuring safe access only when the user is fully conscious and capable of responding correctly.

Implementation Method 1

obtain data about a brain activity state of the user utilizing an EEG sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroencephalography:

Implementation Method 2

determine whether the user has moved by utilizing an accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11635814B2Preventing access to potentially hazardous environments
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11635814B2 patent drawing
  • US11635814B2 patent drawing
  • US11635814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer system, and a computer program product for managing a plurality of electronic devices controlling access to one or more hazards in a physical environment. The present invention may include detecting a plurality of brain-wave patterns associated with a user. The present invention may then, in response to detecting motion of the user and the plurality of brain-wave patterns associated with the user matching a pattern, include operating at least one electronic device to disable access to a corresponding hazard. The present invention may further include operating the at least one electronic device to enable access to the corresponding hazard based on receiving input from the user to enable the at least one electronic device, wherein the input being received from the user is in response to prompting the user to correctly respond to a question previously answered by the user.