Brainwave Signal Control Using Vibrotactile Feedback Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brainwave-controlled devices and systems face limitations in effectively reading and interpreting brain signals for applications such as assistive technologies, personal safety, and biofeedback, particularly in providing seamless interaction with the environment without electrical stimulation, and in efficiently capturing and utilizing brain activity for tasks like vision assistance and musical performance.

Innovation Solution

A brainwave actuated apparatus comprising a sensor for outputting brainwave signals, an effector responsive to these signals, and a controller that determines signal characteristics to derive control inputs for the effector, integrated with environmental interfaces and vibrotactile feedback loops, allowing for non-invasive interaction and feedback without electrical stimulation, and enabling applications like vision assistance and biofeedback training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electrical contacts are used to read brainwaves, then brainwave signals can be obtained, but electrical stimulation may occur which is uncomfortable for users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrainwave signal detectionVSAvoidelectrical stimulation discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrical stimulation-based brainwave reading with a mechanical vibration-based system. The effector device generates vibrations that are transmitted through the user's body to stimulate the brain, eliminating the need for direct electrical contacts on the brain while still achieving brainwave interaction and measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If brainwave signals are used to control devices, then seamless interaction with the environment is achieved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental interactionVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary effector device that acts as a mediator between the user's brainwaves and the environment. This effector receives vibration signals from the user's body and translates them into environmental interactions, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining seamless interaction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If vibrotactile effectors are used for feedback, then non-invasive interaction is achieved, but the precision of brain signal interpretation must be improved

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinvasivenessVSAvoidbrain signal interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the effector device provides vibrotactile feedback to the user based on interpreted brain signals. This closed-loop system continuously monitors and adjusts the vibration patterns according to the user's neural responses, improving signal interpretation precision through iterative refinement while maintaining non-invasive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables effective non-invasive interaction with the environment, provides assistive technologies for the visually impaired, and enhances biofeedback training by accurately interpreting and responding to brain signals, improving user interaction and performance in various tasks.

Implementation Method 1

Typically brainwaves are read using electrical contacts to the brain of one or more users. The electrical signals are amplified and supplied to a signal processing device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

an effector responsive to an input signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromechanical conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

The controller is adapted to determine characteristics of a brainwave signal output by said brainwave sensor and based on said characteristics, derive a control signal to output to said effector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal processing:

Implementation Method 4

vibrating a device with an intensity dependent upon said characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS11445971B2Brainwave actuated apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 INTERAXON
  • US11445971B2 patent drawing
  • US11445971B2 patent drawing
  • US11445971B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A brainwave actuated apparatus has a brainwave sensor for outputting a brainwave signal, an effector responsive to an input signal, and a controller operatively connected to an output of said brainwave sensor and a control input to said effector. The controller is adapted to determine characteristics of a brainwave signal output by said brainwave sensor and based on said characteristics, derive a control signal to output to said effector.