Brainwave Control With Vibrotactile Feedback Without Electrical Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brainwave reading technologies face limitations in effectively interpreting and utilizing brain signals for control and feedback applications, particularly in providing intuitive interfaces for devices and environments without electrical stimulation, and in enabling seamless interaction between brain states and external systems.

Innovation Solution

A brainwave actuated apparatus comprising a sensor, controller, and effector, where the controller processes brainwave signals to derive control signals for the effector, enabling applications such as assistive technologies, personal safety devices, and biofeedback systems without the need for electrical stimulation, using sensors like EEG and vibrotactile effectors for feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electrical contacts are used to read brainwaves, then brain signals can be detected, but electrical stimulation may cause discomfort or safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain signal detectionVSAvoidelectrical stimulation discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrical stimulation mechanisms with mechanical vibration mechanisms. The effector device uses vibration motors to generate tactile feedback instead of using electrical contacts to stimulate the brain, thereby maintaining measurement capability while eliminating the harmful electrical stimulation effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces vibration as an intermediary mechanism between the control system and the user. Instead of direct electrical contact for both reading and stimulating, the system uses vibration motors as intermediaries to provide tactile feedback, reducing direct electrical interaction with the body

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If brainwave signals are processed to control devices, then intuitive control is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitive controlVSAvoidsignal processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed to perform multiple functions: it processes brainwave signals for control, monitors signal characteristics, and coordinates multiple effectors. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby managing system complexity while maintaining intuitive control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the brainwave reading function and the control function into an integrated system. The controller directly processes signals from the brainwave sensor and translates them into control commands for effectors, merging multiple functions into a unified device that reduces overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If vibrotactile effectors are used for feedback, then non-electrical stimulation is provided, but feedback intensity control becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical stimulation eliminationVSAvoidfeedback control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of vibration parameters including frequency, amplitude, and duration. The controller adjusts these parameters in real-time based on the processed brainwave characteristics, enabling nuanced feedback control without requiring complex additional hardware. This dynamic adjustment capability provides fine-grained control over feedback intensity while maintaining the safety advantage of non-electrical stimulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables intuitive control and feedback systems that allow users to interact with devices and environments through brain signals, providing assistive technologies and biofeedback without electrical stimulation, enhancing user experience and safety, and allowing for the interpretation of brain states for various applications.

Implementation Method 1

Typically brainwaves are read using electrical contacts to the brain of one or more users. The electrical signals are amplified and supplied to a signal processing device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

vibrating a device with an intensity dependent upon said characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20220386933A1Brainwave actuated apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.12.08 INTERAXON
  • US20220386933A1 patent drawing
  • US20220386933A1 patent drawing
  • US20220386933A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A brainwave actuated apparatus has a brainwave sensor for outputting a brainwave signal, an effector responsive to an input signal, and a controller operatively connected to an output of said brainwave sensor and a control input to said effector. The controller is adapted to determine characteristics of a brainwave signal output by said brainwave sensor and based on said characteristics, derive a control signal to output to said effector.