Aircraft Electric Brake Actuator Duty Cycle Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft electric brake systems lack a mechanism to limit brake force and prevent prolonged high-force applications, leading to oversized motors and controllers due to excessive duty cycles.

Innovation Solution

An electric brake control system that determines the aircraft's operational state and brake pedal force, commanding the actuator brakes to engage and de-energize the electric brake actuators when in a ground-idle state and exceeding a set force magnitude, thereby reducing the duty cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If electric brake actuators are used without a mechanism to limit brake force or prevent prolonged high-force applications, then the brakes can provide sufficient stopping power, but the motors and controllers become oversized due to excessive duty cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake forceVSAvoidmotor and controller size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The brake actuation system is divided into two separate braking mechanisms: friction brakes for primary stopping power and actuator brakes for duty cycle management. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, enabling smaller motors and controllers while maintaining sufficient overall brake force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator brake serves as an intermediary mechanism that limits the force applied by the electric brake actuator during ground-idle operations. By introducing this intermediate force-limiting component, the system can use smaller motors and controllers without sacrificing the ability to provide sufficient stopping power when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If electric brake actuators operate with high duty cycles during ground-idle operations, then the brakes can hold the aircraft against engine thrust, but the motors and controllers must be oversized to handle the prolonged operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake holding capabilityVSAvoidmotor and controller power rating
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The braking function is segmented into friction brakes for primary stopping and actuator brakes for duty-cycle-limited holding. This allows the electric brake actuator to operate with reduced duty cycle while maintaining reliable brake holding capability through the combined system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by introducing duty cycle limitations on the electric brake actuator during ground-idle operations. By controlling when and how long the actuator operates, the system maintains reliability without requiring oversized motors and controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the electric brake actuator is continuously energized to maintain brake force, then the braking function is reliable, but the duty cycle increases and requires oversized components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake force consistencyVSAvoidactuator duty cycle
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous actuation, the system uses periodic action through the actuator brake mechanism that engages and disengages based on duty cycle requirements. This periodic operation maintains brake force consistency while reducing the duration the electric brake actuator remains energized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful braking action through the combination of friction brakes and actuator brakes, while the electric brake actuator itself operates intermittently. The useful braking function continues without interruption even though the actuator duty cycle is reduced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9440735B2Aircraft electric brake actuation system and method
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9440735B2 patent drawing
  • US9440735B2 patent drawing
  • US9440735B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of controlling aircraft brakes in an aircraft that includes a brake pedal and an electric brake actuator. An aircraft operational state is determined and an application force that is supplied to the brake pedal is determined. When the determined aircraft operational state is a ground-idle state and the determined application force is greater than a set force magnitude, an actuator brake is moved to engage the electric brake actuator and the electric brake actuator is de-energized.