Brake Pedal Clevis Pin Assembly With Vision-Guided Robots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual assembly of a brake system, specifically the coupling of a clevis pin and snap pin to connect a pedal arm of a brake pedal to a clevis on a push rod, results in reduced productivity and inconsistent work quality due to time-consuming processes and limited workspace.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing robots equipped with grippers, vision sensors, and torque sensors to automate the assembly process, ensuring precise alignment and coupling of the clevis pin and snap pin through scanning, correcting, and rotating mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual assembly is used to couple the clevis pin and snap pin, then the workspace requirements are reduced, but the productivity decreases and work quality becomes inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidassembly system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly system is divided into multiple robotic arms, each responsible for specific components (pedal arm, clevis pin, snap pin). This segmentation allows parallel operation and reduces overall assembly time while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical assembly operations are replaced with automated robotic systems equipped with specialized grippers. The robotic arms perform positioning, insertion, and coupling operations that were previously done manually, significantly improving productivity and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual assembly is used to couple the clevis pin and snap pin, then the device complexity is reduced, but the work quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly precisionVSAvoidassembly system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Vision sensors are integrated into the robotic system to detect the positions and orientations of components in real-time. This feedback enables the robotic arms to adjust their movements dynamically, ensuring precise alignment and coupling of the clevis pin and snap pin, thereby improving assembly precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The vision sensors create digital representations (optical copies) of the physical components and their positions. This allows the control system to process spatial information and guide the robotic arms with high precision without requiring complex mechanical guidance mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated assembly with robots is implemented, then the productivity increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidsystem operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is designed with multi-functional grippers that can handle different components (pedal arm, clevis pin, snap pin) using the same basic mechanism. This universality reduces operational complexity by eliminating the need for multiple specialized tools or frequent tool changes, while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If vision sensors are used for scanning and alignment, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Vision sensors serve as an intermediary between the physical components and the robotic control system. They capture optical information about component positions and orientations, converting physical spatial relationships into digital data that the control system can process, thereby achieving high alignment precision without direct mechanical measurement mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Automates the assembly process, reducing work time, improving productivity and quality, and enabling data conversion of quality-related information for enhanced convenience.

Implementation Method 1

The second gripper may be an electromagnetic gripper configured to prevent the clevis pin from coming off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentUS12415582B2Apparatus and method for automatic assembly of brake system
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12415582B2 patent drawing
  • US12415582B2 patent drawing
  • US12415582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Proposed are an apparatus and a method for automatic assembly of a brake system, wherein the work of coupling a clevis pin (300) and a snap pin (400) to connect a pedal arm (110) of a brake pedal (100) to a clevis (220) provided on a push rod (210) of a brake (200) is automated, thereby contributing to work efficiency improvement and quality enhancement.