Brake Controller Redundancy With Fault Output Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle brake systems lack reliability in monitoring and redundancy, particularly for antilock and antiskid functions, which can lead to failures in critical braking situations.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle brake system with at least three controllers connected to each other, where each controller includes a braking force calculation unit and a determination unit that compares results to identify normal or abnormal functioning, and an output block section to isolate non-functional controllers, ensuring redundancy and improved reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single controller is used in the brake system, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability and redundancy of the system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system reliabilityVSAvoidcontroller configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake control system is segmented into multiple independent controllers (first controller, second controller, third controller) that can operate autonomously. Each controller has its own driver control unit and braking force calculation unit, allowing the system to divide functionality across multiple units for improved reliability and fault tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements predetermined determination units in each controller that continuously monitor and compare braking force calculation results before actual braking operations. This beforehand monitoring detects abnormalities in advance, allowing the system to switch to backup controllers or block faulty outputs before failures affect brake performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If multiple controllers are used without monitoring, then the system redundancy is improved, but the ability to detect and isolate failures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem redundancyVSAvoidcontroller abnormality detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Each determination unit continuously receives feedback from braking force calculation results of all controllers. The determination units compare these results in real-time, creating a feedback loop that automatically detects discrepancies and identifies abnormal controllers based on inconsistent braking force calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in braking force calculation parameters across different controllers. When a controller's calculation results deviate from the predetermined range or differ significantly from other controllers, the determination unit identifies this parameter change as an abnormality and blocks that controller's output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If all controllers operate without output blocking, then the system productivity is maintained, but the harmful effects of abnormal controllers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system operation continuityVSAvoidabnormal controller output
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The determination units extract and isolate abnormal controllers from the system by blocking their outputs. When a controller is identified as abnormal through comparison of braking force calculation results, its output is separately blocked while other normal controllers continue to operate, effectively removing the harmful element without shutting down the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The output block sections are predetermined safety mechanisms that prevent abnormal controller outputs from affecting brake operation. By having these blocking mechanisms in place beforehand, the system cushions against the harmful effects of controller failures before they can impact braking performance or safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11738726B2Vehicle brake system
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 ASTEMO LTD
  • US11738726B2 patent drawing
  • US11738726B2 patent drawing
  • US11738726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle brake system (1) includes a first control device (10) and a second control device (11) that respectively include a master controller (30), a first sub-controller (40), and a second sub-controller (41) that are connected to one another. Each of the master controller (30), the first sub-controller (40), and the second sub-controller (41) includes a braking force calculation unit that calculates braking force of electric brakes (16a to 16d), and a determination unit that compares braking force calculation results of the controllers to determine whether itself is normal. The determination unit includes an output block section that blocks, when the determination unit determines that any one of the controllers is not normal, an output of the controller that is determined to be not normal.