Brake Disc Laser Cladding With Differential Powder Melting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing wear protection layers on friction brake bodies using laser cladding lack optimal control over the melting and mixing of multiple powdered additives, leading to suboptimal bonding and potential detachment during thermomechanical stress.

Innovation Solution

The method involves separately feeding at least two powdered additives into the laser cladding process, controlling their dwell times by varying angles and distances from the laser beam, ensuring selective melting and uniform mixing to enhance the substance-to-substance bond with the base body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If multiple powdered additives are fed as a mixture during laser cladding, then the process is simple, but the additives cannot be individually controlled for optimal melting and bonding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidadditive melting control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the additive delivery system into separate channels, with each powdered additive being fed through its own nozzle independently. This segmentation allows each additive to be controlled separately in terms of feed rate, particle size distribution, and timing of introduction into the laser beam, enabling precise control over melting and bonding characteristics while maintaining process simplicity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If additives are blown at the same angle and distance from the laser beam, then the setup is simple, but the dwell times in the laser beam are identical limiting selective melting control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle arrangementVSAvoiddwell time control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing each nozzle to be positioned at different angles and distances from the laser beam path. This enables each additive to experience a locally optimized dwell time in the laser beam according to its specific melting requirements, particle characteristics, and desired bonding behavior, while the overall system maintains a relatively simple geometric configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If the laser beam power is increased to ensure complete melting of all additives, then melting is improved, but excessive melting or dissociation of certain additives occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadditive meltingVSAvoidadditive dissociation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by allowing different additives to receive different degrees of laser energy exposure through controlled dwell times. Additives with lower melting points or higher susceptibility to dissociation are exposed to the laser beam for shorter durations or at lower power densities, while additives requiring more energy receive correspondingly higher exposure, thereby achieving complete melting without excessive heating or dissociation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If additives are fed separately with different dwell times, then optimal bonding is achieved, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstance-to-substance bondVSAvoidadditive feeding system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate additive feeding operations into a single integrated laser cladding process. By synchronizing the independent nozzle systems to operate simultaneously during one continuous laser beam pass, the process achieves optimal bonding reliability through controlled differential dwell times while avoiding the complexity of multiple sequential processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a wear protection layer with improved adhesion, reduced detachment, and enhanced properties such as corrosion and wear resistance, particularly when using iron-based alloys and hard materials like carbides.

Implementation Method 1

the surface of the base body to be coated is melted locally by means of a laser beam, and a powdered additive is added. Before reaching the molten surface, the additive is at least partially liquefied or completely melted by the laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the surface of the base body to be coated is melted locally by means of a laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

each of the additives is blown by at least one nozzle each onto the base body such that it enters the laser beam before reaching the base body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow:

Data Source

PatentUS12485504B2Method for producing a friction brake body
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 BREYDEN GMBH
  • US12485504B2 patent drawing
  • US12485504B2 patent drawing
  • US12485504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for producing a friction brake body, in particular a brake disc, which has a main part with a frictional contact region. A wear protection layer is produced on the frictional contact region by way of laser cladding using a laser beam oriented towards the frictional contact region. The wear protection layer is produced by at least one pulverulent additive during the laser cladding. At least two pulverulent additives are added simultaneously such that the dwell time thereof in the laser beam differs.