Brake Disk Composite Wear Layer for Crack-Resistant Friction Brakes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Friction brakes in motor vehicles experience significant wear and corrosion due to the frictional contact between the brake disk and pad, leading to abrasion and brake dust generation, which existing antiwear layers fail to adequately address.

Innovation Solution

A friction brake element with an antiwear layer made of ferritic-austenitic steel containing finely dispersed hard material particles, such as carbides, oxides, or borides, and an optional intermediate layer of pure ferritic-austenitic steel, applied via laser buildup welding or thermal spraying, providing enhanced wear, corrosion, and cracking resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an antiwear layer is applied to the brake disk, then wear resistance is improved, but the layer may be prone to cracking under thermomechanical stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The antiwear layer is designed as a composite material consisting of a ferritic-austenitic steel matrix with embedded hard particles (such as carbides, oxides, nitrides, or borides). The ferritic-austenitic steel provides a two-phase microstructure where austenite islands within the ferritic matrix enhance crack resistance by stopping crack propagation at phase boundaries, while the hard particles dispersed throughout the matrix provide wear resistance. This composite structure resolves the contradiction between wear resistance and crack resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If hard material particles are added to increase wear resistance, then abrasion resistance is improved, but the coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch between layer and main element increases causing stresses and potential cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasion resistanceVSAvoidstress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the proportion of hard material particles to be less than or equal to 70% by volume of the antiwear layer, and ensures a matrix phase proportion of at least 30% by volume. This parameter optimization balances wear resistance (provided by hard particles) with stress resistance (provided by the ductile ferritic-austenitic steel matrix), preventing excessive thermal expansion mismatch and cracking while maintaining high abrasion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If chromium and nitrogen are added to increase corrosion resistance, then corrosion protection is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies compositional parameters for the ferritic-austenitic steel matrix, including the addition of chromium and/or nitrogen to enhance corrosion resistance. By defining specific compositional ranges and utilizing standard metallurgical processes for producing ferritic-austenitic steels, the patent achieves improved corrosion resistance while maintaining manufacturability through established industrial practices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces abrasion, corrosion, and cracking of the brake disk, ensuring low wear rates and preventing crack propagation, thereby increasing the durability and reliability of the friction brake element.

Implementation Method 1

At the phase boundaries, in particular at the transition from ferrite to the more ductile austenite, cracks that arise during cooling or under the thermomechanical stresses during braking operations come to a stop for fracture-mechanical reasons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase boundary crack stopping: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 2

The antiwear layer is applied to the main element by laser buildup welding or thermal spraying

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser buildup welding: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 3

The antiwear layer is applied to the main element by laser buildup welding or thermal spraying

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal spraying: Plasma Spray

Data Source

PatentUS11927230B2Friction brake body for a friction brake, friction brake and method for producing a friction brake body
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11927230B2 patent drawing
  • US11927230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A friction brake body for a friction brake of a motor vehicle, in particular a brake disk, includes a base body made in particular from gray cast iron and having at least one wear resistant layer formed on a friction contact surface of the base body. The wear resistant layer is made from ferritic-austenitic steel and includes an incorporated hard material particle, in particular finely distributed hard material particle.