Engine Start-Stop Control via Brake Pedal Force Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current engine start-stop systems are inefficient as they cannot accurately anticipate when an engine should be shut down, leading to short, unproductive shutdowns that consume more fuel than they save, and excessive idling causes engine wear and reduces fuel economy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that allows drivers to signal engine start-stop devices to turn off or restart the engine by varying brake pedal force, using a combination of fast and slow filters to interpret the driver's intent based on brake pedal force thresholds, ensuring engine control only when the vehicle is stopped.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If automatic engine stop-start systems are implemented, then fuel economy can be improved during idle periods, but the systems cannot accurately anticipate when engine shutdown is appropriate, leading to short unproductive shutdowns that consume more fuel than they save

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidaccuracy of engine shutdown timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from brake pedal force sensors to continuously monitor driver braking behavior and adjust engine control decisions accordingly. The ECU processes real-time brake force data to determine driver intent, creating a closed-loop control system that improves the accuracy of engine shutdown timing based on actual driver actions rather than relying solely on predetermined conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the driver to directly control engine shutdown and restart decisions through their natural braking actions. By applying increasing force to the brake pedal after the vehicle stops, the driver self-initiates engine shutdown without requiring separate controls or complex system interpretations, making the system serve the driver's intent directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If engine shutdown is triggered by brake pedal detection, then engine wear from idling can be reduced, but the system may misinterpret normal braking as engine shutdown requests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine wearVSAvoidbrake pedal force interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the interpretation of brake pedal force based on the vehicle's motion state. During vehicle deceleration, normal braking forces are expected and do not trigger engine shutdown. Only after the vehicle comes to a complete stop does the system consider increasing brake force as a potential engine shutdown request. This dynamic state-dependent interpretation prevents misidentification of driver intent while accurately detecting genuine shutdown requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes predetermined force thresholds that must be exceeded to trigger engine shutdown, creating a clear distinction between normal braking and shutdown requests. By setting these thresholds in advance and requiring sustained force above the threshold after stopping, the system prevents premature or accidental engine shutdown while maintaining sensitivity to genuine driver intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple threshold values are used to determine engine shutdown, then false triggers can be avoided, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse trigger preventionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake pedal force range is segmented into multiple zones with different meanings: normal braking forces during motion, moderate forces after stopping, and high forces indicating shutdown intent. By dividing the force spectrum into distinct segments with specific threshold values, the system achieves reliable differentiation between various driver actions without requiring complex algorithms, as each segment has clear boundaries and interpretations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9951738B2Method of signaling an engine stop or start request
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 VOYOMOTIVE LLC
  • US9951738B2 patent drawing
  • US9951738B2 patent drawing
  • US9951738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides a computer implemented method which allows the driver to request engine shut down and engine and restarts the engine of a motor vehicle by changing driver brake pedal force, that is, the force which the driver applies to the brake pedal, after the vehicle has stopped. After the vehicle has stopped, changes in the driver brake pedal force are compared to threshold values to determine if the driver is requesting an engine stop or an engine start.