Brake Pedal Simulator Link Mechanism for Continuous Force Sensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional brake pedal simulators for vehicles fail to accurately replicate the changing foot effort sensation with stroke, leading to a sudden increase in reaction force and sensitivity issues due to fixed spring constants or temperature-dependent rubber hardness.

Innovation Solution

A brake pedal simulator utilizing a link structure and elastic member, specifically a spring, to dynamically adjust foot effort based on stroke, forming a rhombus shape with hinge connections and snap rings to ensure continuous mechanical reaction force increase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed spring constant is used inside the master cylinder, then the structure is simple, but the foot effort sensation becomes discontinuous and suddenly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidpedal feel continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is divided into multiple segments (first spring and second spring) with different spring constants. The first spring has a smaller spring constant for initial stroke, and the second spring has a larger spring constant for subsequent stroke. This segmentation allows continuous and natural increase of foot effort sensation without sudden jumps, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and pedal feel continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static fixed spring constant to a dynamic multi-stage spring constant system. The spring constant changes dynamically based on the stroke position, providing small resistance initially and increasing resistance as stroke progresses. This dynamic adjustment maintains pedal feel continuity while keeping the mechanical structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If rubber is used as the elastic member, then the structure is simple, but the foot effort changes with temperature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidfoot effort stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from temperature-sensitive rubber to temperature-insensitive metal springs. The spring constant is adjusted through material selection and geometric design rather than relying on rubber hardness, which varies with temperature. This parameter change eliminates temperature dependency while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single spring is used, then the device is simple, but the foot effort inclination cannot change from small to high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidfoot effort inclination adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single spring is segmented into multiple springs (first spring and second spring) arranged in sequence along the stroke direction. Each spring provides a different spring constant for different stroke phases, enabling the foot effort inclination to transition from small to high. This segmentation achieves adaptability while maintaining relatively simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the spring system are assigned different local qualities (spring constants). The first spring region has a smaller spring constant for initial soft feel, while the second spring region has a larger spring constant for subsequent firm feel. This local quality differentiation enables the system to adapt to changing foot effort requirements throughout the stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively replicates the changing foot effort sensation of an actual vehicle, reducing manufacturing costs and preventing discontinuous reaction force increases, thereby enhancing pedal feel sensitivity.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic member elastically supporting the link unit and configured to form reaction force by elastic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A brake pedal simulator utilizing a link structure and elastic member, specifically a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS9003872B2Brake pedal simulator for vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9003872B2 patent drawing
  • US9003872B2 patent drawing
  • US9003872B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A brake pedal simulator apparatus for a vehicle for implementing a change in a foot effort applied to a brake pedal for each stroke, may include a pedal arm including one end hinge-connected to one side of a frame and the other end in which a pad may be mounted, a link unit including a plurality of links mutually connected between the frame and the pedal arm, and an elastic member elastically supporting the link unit and configured to form reaction force by elastic force in the pedal arm according to the each stroke by the foot effort applied to the pedal arm.