Brake Pressure Control via Iterative On-Off Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional brake apparatuses face difficulties in maintaining pressure and improving braking efficiency when foreign objects are present, leading to increased maintenance costs, driver anxiety, and potential power waste, while also risking traffic accidents.

Innovation Solution

A pressure control apparatus that includes an input unit for detecting current pressure values, a determination unit to assess if the pressure is at a standard level, and a control unit to adjust the brake system by iterating on/off operations to reach the standard pressure, incorporating components like motors, hydraulic valves, and communication units to manage pressure and communicate with maintenance services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional brake apparatuses operate normally, then braking function is provided, but foreign objects cause difficulty in normal operation and pressure maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake operation reliabilityVSAvoidforeign object interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnosis by detecting pressure values before braking operations to identify foreign objects in advance. The control unit compares detected pressure with standard values and iteratively adjusts pressure to eliminate foreign objects before they interfere with normal braking operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors pressure values during braking operations and provides feedback to the control unit. When foreign objects are detected through pressure anomalies, the system iteratively adjusts pressure and continues monitoring until the foreign object is eliminated and normal operation is restored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If foreign objects are removed through iterative on/off operations, then braking efficiency is improved, but additional time and operations are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking efficiencyVSAvoidtime for iterative operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pressure adjustment operations during vehicle operation to remove foreign objects before they significantly degrade braking performance. By addressing issues early through iterative on/off operations, the system prevents major efficiency losses that would require more extensive repairs later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The brake system performs self-diagnosis and self-correction by automatically detecting pressure anomalies caused by foreign objects and executing iterative on/off operations to remove them. This autonomous maintenance capability eliminates the need for manual intervention and reduces overall system downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If pressure is maintained at standard levels through iterative operations, then braking efficiency improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure maintenanceVSAvoidenergy for pressure control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous pressure adjustment, the system employs periodic on/off operations to remove foreign objects and restore pressure to standard levels. The control unit monitors pressure values and triggers iterative operations only when anomalies are detected, rather than continuously adjusting pressure, thereby reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from pressure sensors to determine when iterative operations are necessary. By comparing detected pressure values with standard values and only initiating energy-consuming operations when deviations are detected, the system maintains pressure reliability while minimizing unnecessary energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If diagnostic and control operations are performed continuously, then foreign objects are detected early preventing accidents, but system complexity and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident preventionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses simple feedback mechanisms where the control unit compares pressure sensor readings with predetermined standard values. When deviations indicate foreign objects, the system triggers iterative on/off operations. This feedback-based approach enables early accident prevention through continuous monitoring without requiring complex diagnostic algorithms or additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit autonomously performs diagnostic functions by monitoring pressure values and automatically initiating iterative operations when foreign objects are detected. This self-service capability eliminates the need for complex external diagnostic systems while maintaining early detection and accident prevention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances braking efficiency, reduces maintenance costs, alleviates driver anxiety, optimizes energy use by recovering power, and prevents accidents by ensuring proper pressure is maintained and communicated effectively.

Implementation Method 1

the input unit may receive the input of the current pressure value output from the piston pump through an operation of the motor according to a braking will of a driver who steps on the brake pedal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure generation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

the determination unit may determine whether the input current pressure value is the preset standard pressure value when the current pressure value is provided to the hydraulic valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic flow control: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

transfer a hydraulic adjustment command to the brake apparatus so that the current pressure value reaches the standard pressure value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure regulation: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10363916B2Pressure control apparatus and pressure control method thereof
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 HL MANDO CORP
  • US10363916B2 patent drawing
  • US10363916B2 patent drawing
  • US10363916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are a pressure control apparatus and a pressure control method thereof. The pressure control apparatus includes an input unit configured to receive an input of a current pressure value of a brake apparatus detected by a detection apparatus when drive of the brake apparatus is prepared, a determination unit configured to determine whether the input current pressure value is a preset standard pressure value, and a control unit configured to receive the current pressure value, transfer a determination command to the determination unit, transfer a hydraulic adjustment command to the brake apparatus so that the current pressure value reaches the standard pressure value when the current pressure value is not the standard pressure value, and cause an on/off operation of the brake apparatus to be iterated a predetermined number of times for a predetermined time.