Braking System Control State Transitions for Emergency Stop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle braking systems face challenges in seamlessly transitioning between manual and automated control modes, particularly during emergencies or system failures, where ensuring safe and efficient deceleration is critical.

Innovation Solution

A braking system with multiple control states that includes a primary and secondary brake control module, allowing transitions between normal and degraded operation modes, and enabling emergency stop states, with a vehicle control module managing these transitions based on predefined conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the braking system transitions between manual and automated control modes during operation, then the adaptability and versatility of the vehicle control system is improved, but the device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring system state increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mode transition capabilityVSAvoidbraking system control structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The braking control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a vehicle control module that generates brake requests, a braking system controller that manages state transitions, and braking components that execute deceleration. This segmentation allows each module to have specialized responsibilities, making the complex transition logic manageable and maintainable while preserving adaptability across multiple control modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system implements dynamic state transitions between manual and automated control modes based on real-time operating conditions. The system can switch between different control states (manual control state, automated control state, emergency stop state) depending on vehicle speed, brake request status, and system availability, allowing the control structure to adapt dynamically rather than being fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the braking system enters emergency stop state with multiple state entry conditions, then the reliability and safety of emergency braking is improved, but the device complexity and measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency stop execution safetyVSAvoidstate condition monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of state entry conditions before transitioning to emergency stop state. The braking system controller checks multiple conditions (vehicle speed threshold, brake request status, current control state) before executing the emergency stop, ensuring that the transition is appropriate and safe. This preliminary action prevents premature or incorrect emergency braking activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system implements continuous feedback monitoring of vehicle state parameters (speed, brake requests, control mode) to determine whether emergency stop conditions are met. The system constantly evaluates the relationship between current vehicle state and emergency stop criteria, allowing reliable detection of when emergency braking should be initiated based on real-time feedback rather than static thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the braking system allows transition from manual to non-manual control state during normal operation mode, then the ease of operation and automation level is improved, but the loss of time for driver reaction and control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated control accessibilityVSAvoiddriver control response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system implements dynamic control state transitions that can occur rapidly in response to changing vehicle conditions or driver input. The system allows smooth transitions between manual and automated control states during normal operation, with the braking system controller managing the switch without requiring the driver to physically disengage or reconfigure the system, thereby minimizing control response time while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the braking system prevents transition from manual to non-manual control state during degraded operation mode, then the reliability and safety of braking control is improved, but the adaptability and versatility of the control system decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking control safety in failure conditionVSAvoidcontrol mode flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system implements preliminary anti-action by preventing transitions to automated control modes when the system is in a degraded state. The braking system controller detects degraded operation conditions (such as brake fluid level issues, sensor failures, or actuator problems) and blocks automated control state transitions to prevent unsafe operation. This protective measure ensures reliability by avoiding automated braking when system integrity is compromised, while still allowing manual control to maintain basic vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10661764B1Braking system control state transitions
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 APPLE INC
  • US10661764B1 patent drawing
  • US10661764B1 patent drawing
  • US10661764B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a vehicle includes operating a braking system in robotic control state, determining that an emergency stop state is to be entered by the braking system, entering the emergency stop state upon determining that all conditions from a group of state entry conditions are satisfied, decelerating the vehicle using the braking system while in the emergency stop state, determining, while in the emergency stop state, that all conditions from a group of state exit conditions are satisfied, and exiting the emergency stop state in response to determining that all conditions from the group of state exit conditions are satisfied.