Automated Braking Zone Control for Driver-Intent Preservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated braking systems may execute emergency or contact avoidance operations excessively, hindering the driver's intended travel based on the vehicle's travel scene and obstacle position relative to the host vehicle.

Innovation Solution

An automated braking control device that determines an automated braking execution area based on vehicle traveling direction and speed, using sensors to set boundaries for appropriate braking, and maintains these areas until the vehicle stops, adjusting the area according to forward or backward travel to enhance detection accuracy and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated braking is executed based on simple obstacle detection, then safety is improved, but excessive braking occurs that hinders driver's intended travel

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriver's intended travel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection space into multiple zones (first detection zone, second detection zone, third detection zone) with different braking control characteristics. Each zone has specific angular ranges and distance thresholds that determine different braking behaviors, allowing the system to provide appropriate braking response based on the local spatial characteristics of detected objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The automated braking control device dynamically adjusts braking force based on real-time detection results, vehicle speed, and object position. The braking control is not fixed but adapts to changing conditions, modulating brake application according to the specific situation to avoid excessive braking while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If automated braking execution area is set wide to improve safety, then detection accuracy is improved, but excessive braking control is triggered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidbraking control frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Different detection zones have different angular widths and distance thresholds. The first detection zone has a specific angular range for forward detection, the second detection zone has a different angular range for backward detection, and the third detection zone has yet another configuration. This localized differentiation allows accurate detection without triggering excessive braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters (angular ranges, distance thresholds) based on the specific detection zone and vehicle conditions. By adjusting these parameters locally for different zones and situations, the system achieves accurate detection while avoiding unnecessary braking activations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If automated braking is executed for all detected obstacles, then safety is improved, but driver's travel desire is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidtravel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements zone-specific braking control where different detection zones trigger different braking responses. Some zones may trigger strong braking, others moderate braking, and some may not trigger braking at all depending on the object type and position. This localized differentiation maintains safety for critical obstacles while allowing normal travel for non-critical situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial braking action rather than full braking for all detected objects. The braking control is modulated to provide only the necessary braking force for each specific situation, avoiding excessive braking that would hinder normal travel while still providing adequate safety response for actual hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides more appropriate automated braking control, improving detection accuracy and reducing excessive braking, thereby enhancing safety and reducing driver annoyance during different travel scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

detects an obstacle (object) in a traveling direction of a vehicle by using a camera, a radar, or the like

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

the detection accuracy of the object can be improved, and more appropriate automated braking control according to the traveling state of the vehicle, the state of the object, etc. can be executed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTriangulation:

Data Source

PatentUS12485862B2Automated braking control device and automated braking processing program
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 AISIN CORP
  • US12485862B2 patent drawing
  • US12485862B2 patent drawing
  • US12485862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated braking control device includes: an acquisition unit to acquire traveling direction information representing a traveling direction of a vehicle, speed information related to the vehicle, and position information of an object based on a detection wave transmitted and received for detecting the object in the traveling direction; an area determination unit to determine an automated braking execution area on the basis of the traveling direction information and the speed information, the automated braking execution area being set in at least one of an inner area and an outer area with respect to a vehicle width line, the vehicle width line extending in the traveling direction in accordance with a vehicle width of the vehicle; and an automated braking processing unit to, when the object is detected, determine whether to execute automated braking on the basis of the position information with respect to the automated braking execution area.