Branch-Lane Deceleration Control Using Driver Intention Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to account for the driver's intention when a road structure requiring deceleration is present in a branching traffic lane, leading to inadequate deceleration control during lane changes.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control method that integrates road information and driver intention detection to perform deceleration control based on planned traveling routes, using sensors and navigation systems to determine the need for deceleration and adjust vehicle speed accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If deceleration control is performed based on road information of the planned traveling lane, then the vehicle can safely navigate road structures requiring deceleration, but the control may not correspond to the driver's intention when a branch lane is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of deceleration controlVSAvoidadaptation to driver intention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system obtains driver operation information (steering angle, accelerator depression amount, brake depression amount) as feedback to determine whether the driver intends to follow the planned traveling route. This feedback mechanism allows the deceleration control to adapt to the driver's actual intentions while maintaining safety through proper timing and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The deceleration control system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time driver operation information. When the driver's operations indicate intention to follow the planned route, the system performs deceleration control; when operations suggest otherwise, the system suppresses deceleration control. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between safety and driver intention alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If deceleration control is suppressed when driver intention is unclear, then false deceleration is avoided, but safe deceleration may be missed when the driver intends to follow the planned route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of driver intention recognitionVSAvoidsafety of deceleration control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver intention by continuously monitoring steering angle, accelerator depression amount, and brake depression amount before executing deceleration control. This preliminary action allows the system to determine whether deceleration should be performed in advance, ensuring both safety and accuracy by confirming driver intention before activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple driver operation parameters (steering angle, accelerator depression, brake depression) rather than a single parameter to determine driver intention. This partial or excessive assessment of driver operations increases the accuracy of intention recognition, reducing false negatives while maintaining safety through comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors multiple driver operation parameters, then driver intention can be accurately determined, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of driver intention detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of operation information acquisition
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The operation information acquisition unit serves multiple functions by simultaneously monitoring steering angle, accelerator depression amount, and brake depression amount. This multi-functional approach allows the system to accurately detect driver intention using existing sensors already present in the vehicle, avoiding the need for additional specialized sensors or complex hardware while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12617402B2Vehicle control method and vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12617402B2 patent drawing
  • US12617402B2 patent drawing
  • US12617402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device operates to: obtain road information of a subject vehicle traffic lane in which the subject vehicle travels and road information of a branching traffic lane branching from the subject vehicle traffic lane when the branching traffic lane is present in a traveling direction of the subject vehicle; determine whether driver operation information indicating an intention of traveling in a planned traveling lane on the planned traveling route has been obtained or not, with the branching traffic lane as the planned traveling lane; determine whether a road structure requiring deceleration of the subject vehicle is present in the planned traveling lane; and perform a deceleration control of the subject vehicle based on the road information when determining that the driver operation information has been obtained and determining that the road structure requiring deceleration of the subject vehicle in the planned traveling lane is present.