Multi-Core Branch Predictor Segmentation for Scalable Control Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In distributed computer architectures, conventional branch predictors face challenges in efficiently managing branch predictions across multiple processors, particularly when transitioning between collaborative and independent modes, leading to suboptimal performance due to the need for a single 'master processor' that may result in either an oversized or undersized predictor.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-core processor with a branch predictor arrangement that uses a hash function to map conditional branches to respective processor cores, allowing each core to have its own local or global predictor, thereby acting as a single logical predictor and improving processor performance and scalability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single master processor is designated to make all branch predictions in a distributed architecture, then coordination between processors is simplified, but the predictor becomes either too large for independent mode or too small for collaborative mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction coordinationVSAvoidpredictor size adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the predictor functionality into multiple independent predictors, each associated with a specific processor core. Each predictor maintains its own state and makes predictions independently, eliminating the need for a single oversized master predictor while enabling both collaborative and independent operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which predictors to use based on the operational mode. In collaborative mode, multiple predictors work together; in independent mode, each processor uses its own predictor. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize predictor size and performance for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If each processor core has its own independent predictor, then prediction accuracy improves for independent tasks, but system complexity increases for managing multiple predictors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranch prediction accuracyVSAvoidmulti-predictor management
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By assigning dedicated predictors to individual processor cores, the system achieves high prediction accuracy for independent tasks while distributing the complexity across multiple simple, identical units rather than managing one complex centralized predictor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses identical predictor structures replicated across multiple processor cores. This copying approach simplifies management because each predictor has the same design and behavior, making them interchangeable and easy to coordinate through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the predictor is made large enough to handle collaborative mode with many processors, then prediction accuracy improves for collaborative tasks, but performance degrades when running in independent mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction workload across multiple independent predictors instead of using one large predictor. Each predictor maintains a manageable size optimized for its local processor, avoiding the performance degradation that would result from a single large predictor while maintaining high accuracy through coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its prediction capacity by activating only the necessary number of predictors based on the current operational mode. In independent mode, each processor uses only its local predictor; in collaborative mode, multiple predictors are activated and coordinated, optimizing performance for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional branch predictors are used in distributed architectures, then implementation is straightforward, but scalability is limited when transitioning between operational modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictor implementationVSAvoidoperational mode scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple independent predictors that can be easily manufactured using standard predictor designs. Each predictor is a self-contained unit that can be independently implemented and then coordinated with others, providing both ease of manufacture and scalability across different operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses universal predictor modules that can function in multiple operational modes. Each predictor is designed to work independently for single-processor mode and can also be coordinated with other predictors for multi-processor collaborative mode, providing versatility without requiring different implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8127119B2Control-flow prediction using multiple independent predictors
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US8127119B2 patent drawing
  • US8127119B2 patent drawing
  • US8127119B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally describes computing systems with a multi-core processor comprising one or more branch predictor arrangements. The branch predictor are configured to predict a single and complete flow of program instructions associated therewith and to be performed on at least one processor core of the computing system. Overall processor performance and physical scalability may be improved by the described methods.