Brass Instrument Cross-Brace for Sound Modification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brass instruments lack the ability to easily and cost-effectively modify sound and feel without extensive changes in material, shape, or bracing, which limits their versatility in producing different types of sound for various musical periods.

Innovation Solution

A brass musical instrument design featuring a cross-brace with parallel edges and recessed regions for securement of sound-modifying components, allowing for adjustable pillars within through-holes to modify the instrument's resonances and sound characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If multiple braces are used in the windpath tubing, then structural integrity is improved, but the number of components and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidnumber of braces
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into a single cross-brace component. The cross-brace simultaneously provides structural support (replacing multiple parallel braces) and serves as a mounting platform for sound-modifying components, thereby reducing the total number of braces while maintaining or enhancing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-brace is designed with dual functionality: it acts as a structural support element and as a securement mechanism for sound-modifying components. This multi-functionality allows a single component to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate elements, reducing complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the instrument design is fixed, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but the ability to modify sound and feel is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound modification capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the sound-modifying function from the main instrument body by using detachable sound-modifying components that can be attached to or removed from the cross-brace. This segmentation allows the basic instrument to remain simple and cost-effective to manufacture, while offering adaptability through optional add-on components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument design transitions from a static, fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable system. The cross-brace with its integrated securement features enables musicians to adjust and modify the instrument's sound characteristics, providing adaptability without requiring a completely different instrument design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If sound-modifying components are integrated into the brace structure, then versatility is improved, but brace complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound variation capabilityVSAvoidbrace structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cross-brace is designed as a universal mounting structure that can accommodate various sound-modifying components through standardized securement features (such as through-holes, recessed regions, or contact regions). This universal design allows multiple different components to be attached to the same brace structure without increasing its fundamental complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8247675B2Brass musical instruments with modifiable tonality
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 GETZEN
  • US8247675B2 patent drawing
  • US8247675B2 patent drawing
  • US8247675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a brass musical instrument having two substantially parallel adjacent braces between portions of the instrument windpath tubing, the improvement comprising a cross-brace extending in planes substantially parallel to a plane of the parallel braces and having two opposed edges each with two spaced contact regions secured to a respective one of the parallel braces and a recessed region between the contact regions, thereby allowing elimination of other windpath bracing and providing a beneficial site for sound-modifying components.