BRAVO Diabetes Risk Engine for U.S. Population Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diabetes risk engines, such as the UKPDS risk engine, are not suitable for predicting diabetes progression and mortality in the U.S. population due to data limitations and differences in demographics, treatment algorithms, and screening methods compared to the European population they were developed from, leading to concerns about prediction validity and the need for a population-specific risk engine.

Innovation Solution

The BRAVO Diabetes Risk Engine uses diabetes duration as a time index to simulate diabetes progression and mortality over 40 years, incorporating the ACCORD dataset and left-truncated survival regression to estimate hazard rates, providing a more accurate prediction of long-term outcomes and clinical decision support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UKPDS risk engine is used to predict diabetes outcomes, then the model structure is established, but the prediction validity deteriorates due to population differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction validityVSAvoidpopulation applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by developing population-specific risk equations tailored to different demographic groups (European, African-American, Hispanic, Asian) rather than using a single universal model. Each population group receives customized risk predictions based on their specific baseline hazards and risk factor relationships, thereby improving prediction validity for each local population while maintaining the overall versatility of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by updating the baseline hazards and risk factor coefficients to reflect current U.S. population data from the ACCORD trial, replacing the outdated UKPDS parameters. This allows the model to adapt to changing demographic compositions, treatment algorithms, and screening methods in the U.S. population, resolving the contradiction between maintaining a stable model structure and adapting to population differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If conventional diabetes models are used, then the model framework is available, but the accuracy deteriorates due to outdated data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata currency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively updating the risk engine with current U.S. population data from the ACCORD trial before deployment, rather than relying on outdated UKPDS data. This preliminary data refresh ensures the model starts with accurate, contemporary information about baseline hazards, risk factor relationships, and population characteristics, thereby improving prediction accuracy while preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by validating the updated risk engine against independent U.S. population datasets and comparing predictions to observed outcomes. This feedback mechanism ensures the model maintains high accuracy by identifying and correcting any drift or biases that develop over time, addressing the issue of data currency through continuous verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the risk engine is simplified for ease of use, then the ease of operation improves, but the ability to account for complex interactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical usabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing a computational layer that handles the complex calculations and interactions between multiple risk factors and complications. This intermediary computing system processes the sophisticated risk equations and returns simplified risk scores and recommendations to clinicians, thereby maintaining ease of operation while preserving the ability to account for complex disease interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical computation with automated electronic calculation systems. The complex risk equations involving multiple interacting variables are computed automatically by software, eliminating the need for manual calculations while maintaining full model complexity. This substitution preserves clinical usability by providing instant results without requiring clinicians to understand or perform complex computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20190357853A1Diabetes risk engine and methods thereof for predicting diabetes progression and mortality
Publication Date: 2019.11.28 SHI LIZHENG
  • US20190357853A1 patent drawing
  • US20190357853A1 patent drawing
  • US20190357853A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides for diabetes risk engine systems and methods for predicting diabetes progression and mortality in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus, for the U.S. population, including the building, relating, assessing, and validating outcomes (BRAVO) risk engine. The BRAVO risk engine includes a diabetes-related events module to predict an occurrence of one or more events, a risk factors module to predict a progression of risk factors, a mortality module to predict an occurrence of mortality, and a display interface configured to display the predicted risk of diabetes-related events or mortality. Risk equations for predicting diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular events, hypoglycemia, mortality, and progression of diabetes risk factors were estimated using the data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. The BRAVO risk engine preferably includes risk factors including severe hypoglycemia and common U.S. racial/ethnicity categories, compared to the UKPDS risk engine.