Brayton Refrigeration Flow Control for Fast Heat-Load Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In refrigerating apparatus using a Brayton cycle with multiple stages of compressors, controlling refrigeration capacity in response to changes in heat load is slow and inefficient, leading to reduced coefficient of performance due to changes in rotational speed, which affects adiabatic efficiency and other control parameters.

Innovation Solution

Adjusting the openings of first and second valves to control the flow rate of refrigerant while keeping volume flow rate constant, using a buffer tank to manage pressure differences between high and low pressure lines, and incorporating a heat exchanger to precool refrigerant, allowing for rapid adjustment of refrigeration capacity without reducing adiabatic efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rotational speed control is used to adjust refrigeration capacity, then the refrigeration capacity can be adjusted to match heat load changes, but the response time becomes slow and the coefficient of performance declines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigeration capacity adjustmentVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from rotational speed to refrigerant flow rate. By controlling the flow rate of refrigerant through the expansion turbine while maintaining constant rotational speed, the system achieves rapid adjustment of refrigeration capacity without the slow response and efficiency loss associated with rotational speed control. This parameter substitution resolves the contradiction between adaptability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If rotational speed control is used to adjust refrigeration capacity, then the refrigeration capacity can be adjusted, but the adiabatic efficiency of the expander is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigeration capacity adjustmentVSAvoidadiabatic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes rotational speed control with refrigerant flow rate control. The expansion turbine operates at constant rotational speed, maintaining optimal adiabatic efficiency, while the refrigeration capacity is adjusted by controlling the mass flow rate of refrigerant through the expansion valve. This eliminates the energy loss caused by varying rotational speed while preserving the ability to adjust refrigeration capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple stages of compressors are used to improve cooling capacity, then the refrigeration capacity increases, but the number of control parameters increases and response becomes slower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidnumber of control parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a unified control strategy where the flow rates of refrigerant are controlled for all compression stages simultaneously. Instead of independently controlling each compressor's rotational speed, the system uses a single flow rate control mechanism that affects all stages, reducing the number of control parameters while maintaining the enhanced cooling capacity provided by multiple compression stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables rapid and efficient response to changes in heat load without reducing the coefficient of performance, maintaining energy efficiency and simplifying the system by avoiding the need for external power supply.

Implementation Method 1

a Brayton cycle type refrigerating apparatus which is capable of controlling the cooling capacity against a change in heat load of the object to be cooled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic compression: Adiabatic Heating

Implementation Method 2

reduction the adiabatic efficiency of the expander

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic expansion: Adiabatic Cooling

Implementation Method 3

heat exchanger for exchanging heat between the refrigerant compressed by the compressors and the refrigerant after cooling the object to be cooled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP3153795B1Brayton cycle refrigerating apparatus
Publication Date: 2018.09.05 MAYEKAWA MFG CO LTD
  • EP3153795B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3153795B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP3153795B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To provide a Brayton cycle type refrigerating apparatus using multiple stages of compressors and having a good response without reduction in efficiency due to change in heat load of the object to be cooled, the Brayton cycle type refrigerating apparatus (100) according to the present invention comprises, on a refrigerant line (101), multiple stages of compressors (102a, 102b, 102c), a temperature sensor (160) for detecting heat load of an object to be cooled, and a buffer tank (111) provided between a low pressure line (109) and a high pressure line (110), wherein a flow rate of the refrigerant in the refrigerant line is controlled by controlling opening degrees of valves (112, 113) to adjust the cooling capacity.