Braze Interlock Joining for Complex Turbine Vane Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Casting large or complex metal or alloy components, such as nozzle guide vanes for gas turbine engines, often results in high rejection rates due to defects and limitations in design complexity, as traditional methods require complex and costly processes like bi-casting that can lead to integrity issues and high leakage.

Innovation Solution

A technique involving the use of a braze material that forms a mechanical interlock between components without metallurgical bonding, utilizing an adhesion-resistant material to prevent adherence and employing pre-sintered preform braze alloys that can be heated to form a softened state conforming to the joint region, then cooled to secure the components with reduced porosity and improved mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional casting methods are used to form large or complex metal components, then design complexity and component size are limited, but manufacturing precision and defect rates deteriorate due to casting defects and tolerance deviations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign complexityVSAvoidcast article tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides a complex component into multiple separate components that are joined together using mechanical interlocks and adhesion-resistant materials. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured with higher precision using conventional methods while achieving complex overall geometries through assembly, thereby resolving the contradiction between design complexity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If single crystal casting is used to form nozzle guide vanes, then component integrity is improved, but design complexity is restricted and rejection rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent integrityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle guide vane is divided into multiple components joined by mechanical interlocks with adhesion-resistant materials, replacing the single crystal casting approach. This segmentation maintains component integrity through precise mechanical joining while enabling complex geometries that cannot be achieved with single crystal casting, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If bi-casting process is used to form complex articles, then design complexity is improved, but process complexity and leakage issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign complexityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses separate components joined by mechanical interlocks and adhesion-resistant materials instead of bi-casting. This approach achieves complex designs through modular assembly rather than complex integrated casting processes, reducing process complexity and eliminating leakage issues associated with bi-casting while maintaining design versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If components are joined with metallurgical bonding, then structural strength is improved, but adhesion to joint surfaces increases causing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidjoint defect rate
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces an adhesion-resistant material as an intermediary between the braze material and joint surfaces. This intermediary prevents direct metallurgical bonding and adhesion to joint surfaces, eliminating defects while maintaining structural strength through the mechanical interlock formed by the softened braze material. This resolves the contradiction between structural strength and joint defect rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces defect rates, allows for more complex geometries, and provides a low-leakage structural connection suitable for high-temperature environments, while maintaining component integrity and reducing manufacturing costs by enabling batch processing of multiple components.

Implementation Method 1

An adhesion resistant material present between the braze material and the joint surface. The adhesion resistant material is configured to resist adherence of the braze material to the joint surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion resistance: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

heating the braze material to a processing temperature to form an at least softened material in the joint region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSoftening: Melting

Implementation Method 3

cooling the at least softened material to form a mechanical interlock including the braze material in the joint region joining the first and second components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlock: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS12036627B2Techniques and assemblies for joining components
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 ROLLS ROYCE CORP
  • US12036627B2 patent drawing
  • US12036627B2 patent drawing
  • US12036627B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes example techniques and assemblies for joining a first component and a second component. The techniques may include positioning the first and second component adjacent to each other to define a joint region between adjacent portions of the first component and the second component, the joint region being coated with an adhesion resistant coating. The techniques may also include positioning a braze material in the joint region, heating the braze material to form an at least softened material, and cooling the at least softened material to form a mechanical interlock including the braze material in the joint region joining the first and second components. The braze material does not metallurgically bond to the joint surface.