Brazed Metallic-Graphite Composite for Thermal Mismatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphite fiber and substrate structures face thermal mismatch issues and fragility due to the limited thickness and handling sensitivity of fibercore graphite, which affects their performance in heat exchanger systems.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layer fibercore graphite structure with longer graphite fibers and a sandwich configuration using BNi-2 filler and nickel-based metallic sheets, brazed to a substrate, enhances thermal compatibility and robustness, allowing for efficient brazing and shaping without damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fibercore graphite is used with limited thickness, then the structure can be handled and shaped, but thermal mismatch issues occur with metallic substrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling and shaping capabilityVSAvoidthermal compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite structure combining fibercore graphite layers with monolithic graphite layers. The fibercore graphite provides handling flexibility and machinability, while the monolithic graphite layer provides thermal compatibility with metallic substrates. This composite approach allows the structure to be both handleable and thermally reliable when brazed to aluminum or other metallic substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the thickness of fibercore is increased, then thermal mismatch is reduced, but the material becomes more fragile and difficult to handle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal compatibilityVSAvoidhandling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing fibercore thickness alone, the patent creates a composite where thin fibercore graphite layers (easy to handle) are combined with monolithic graphite layers (thermally compatible). This allows achieving thermal compatibility without making the fibercore itself thicker and more fragile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the graphite structure have different properties: the fibercore regions provide handling flexibility and machinability where needed, while the monolithic graphite regions provide thermal compatibility at the brazing interfaces with metallic substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If graphite fibers are joined to substrate via brazing, then strong bonding is achieved, but thermal mismatch causes stress during thermal processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidthermal stress
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses thermal expansion mismatch by using monolithic graphite layers with thermal expansion properties closer to metallic substrates at the brazing interface. This reduces thermal stress during processing while maintaining strong brazed bonds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #37Thermal expansion

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure allows the monolithic graphite layer to absorb thermal stresses at the interface, protecting the brazed joint from excessive stress while maintaining bonding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If longer graphite fibers are used, then thermal compatibility improves, but the material becomes more fragile during handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal compatibilityVSAvoidresistance to breakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines long-fiber monolithic graphite (thermally compatible) with fibercore graphite (handleable) in a composite structure. This allows achieving thermal compatibility through the monolithic layer without making the entire structure fragile, as the fibercore portions remain easy to handle and shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a more robust and thermally compatible graphite fiber structure that reduces handling damage and improves thermal mismatch issues, enabling efficient heat dissipation and shaping for heat exchanger applications.

Implementation Method 1

securing the at least one metallic sheet to the one or more layers of graphite fiber material via brazing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrazing: Brazing

Data Source

PatentEP2324946B1Method of joining graphite fibers to a substrate via brazing ; corresponding metallic-graphite structure
Publication Date: 2014.01.15 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYST INT INC
  • EP2324946B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2324946B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2324946B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a method of assembling a metallic-graphite structure (10) including arranging one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12) and locating at least one metallic sheet (22) adjacent to the one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12). The at least one metallic sheet (22) is secured to the one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12) via brazing. Further disclosed is a metallic-graphite structure (10) including one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12) and at least one metallic sheet (22) located adjacent to the one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12). The at least one metallic sheet (22) is secured to the one or more layers of graphite fiber material (12) via brazing.