Breadcrumb Routing for Parking Search Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing positioning devices often generate less than optimal routes due to limitations in selection algorithms, computation time, errors in segment lengths, and user preferences, leading to inferior routes despite being labeled as 'best' options.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a positioning device that initiates a search-for-parking mode when approaching a destination, generates alternative routes such as spiral, zig-zag, or grid patterns to prioritize proximity to the destination while avoiding previously traversed segments, and switches to pedestrian mode after parking, allowing for breadcrumb route storage and generation of new segments for future routing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional routing algorithms are used to generate point-to-point routes, then computation is fast and simple, but the routes are suboptimal and do not account for user preferences or real-time conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute qualityVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing problem is divided into multiple segments: initial route generation, real-time condition monitoring, alternative route generation, and dynamic switching. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system transitions from static pre-computed routes to dynamic adaptive routing that continuously monitors real-time conditions and adjusts routes accordingly. The system can dynamically generate alternative routes and switch between them based on current conditions and user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple alternative routes are generated and monitored in real-time, then route quality and adaptability improve, but computation time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute adaptabilityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Alternative routes are pre-generated and stored before real-time conditions change. This preliminary action allows the system to quickly switch between pre-computed alternatives without requiring extensive real-time computation when conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of computation to different parts of the routing problem. High-computation tasks like alternative route generation are performed when time is available, while real-time monitoring uses lighter computation to track conditions and trigger switches when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system continuously monitors positioning data and generates alternative routes, then routing accuracy and user preference satisfaction improve, but device energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoiddevice energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors positioning data at periodic intervals rather than continuously, reducing energy consumption while maintaining sufficient accuracy for route monitoring and alternative generation triggers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the device's existing positioning capabilities (GPS, compass, accelerometer) that are already operating for other navigation functions, eliminating the need for separate high-energy monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the system allows users to specify preferences and dynamically adjusts routes, then user satisfaction improves, but system complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control capabilityVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors user preferences and real-time conditions to dynamically adjust routes without requiring manual user input or complex configuration. The system serves itself by making intelligent adjustments based on pre-set user preferences and current conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user preferences and route conditions, providing feedback loops that automatically adjust routing decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to user needs without requiring direct user intervention or complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8498808B2Method and apparatus for hybrid routing using breadcrumb paths
Publication Date: 2013.07.30 MITAC INT CORP
  • US8498808B2 patent drawing
  • US8498808B2 patent drawing
  • US8498808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for routing using a positioning device and a map having a plurality of segments; generating a first route from a first location to a second location; generating signals to provide directions along the first route using positioning information from the positioning device; detecting that the positioning device is off-route at a third location, the third location being adjacent to the first route; generating a second route by tracking the position of the positioning device from the third location to to a fourth location, and, in some cases, storing the second route for use in route generation.