Residual Current Circuit Breaker Dual Transformer Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing residual current circuit breaker devices face challenges in testing their functionality without interrupting power lines, leading to potential uncontrolled residual currents and mechanical welding of contacts, especially during high-amplitude fault current tests, and existing solutions either require additional components or result in permanent current path interruption.

Innovation Solution

A dual summation current transformer configuration is implemented, where power lines are routed through two identical transformers in series, ensuring continuous current flow during testing, and parallel switching contacts allow independent operation of each unit without interrupting downstream consumers, using PTC resistors or self-protecting circuits to manage thermal loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a bypass with a contactor is used to allow testing without interrupting power lines, then continuous power supply is maintained, but additional components are required and the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous power supplyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a second summation current transformer as a copy of the first transformer to provide backup protection during testing. This copy allows the test to proceed on one transformer while the other continues to monitor and protect the circuit, eliminating the need for complex contactor-based bypass systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If a single summation current transformer is used for testing, then the device structure is simple, but uncontrolled residual currents can occur during testing leading to unwanted tripping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidresidual current protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the protection function into two separate summation current transformers, each capable of independently monitoring and tripping the circuit. This segmentation allows one transformer to be tested while the other provides continuous protection, eliminating uncontrolled residual current scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If mechanical contacts are used to connect summation current transformers, then the transformers can be connected in series, but uncontrolled residual currents can occur leading to shutdown of the transformers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection methodVSAvoidtransformer operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an auxiliary winding on each summation current transformer that acts as an intermediary to detect residual currents and trigger tripping mechanisms. This intermediary system provides controlled protection without requiring direct mechanical contact between transformers, preventing uncontrolled residual current issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the test button is pressed continuously during operation, then the testing function is activated, but thermal overload of the test circuit resistance may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting functionVSAvoidthermal overload
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the test circuit with a PTC resistor that allows continuous testing operation. The PTC resistor's positive temperature coefficient automatically limits current when overheating occurs, enabling the test button to be pressed continuously during operation without causing thermal damage to the circuit components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows for reliable testing of residual current protection without power line interruption, preventing unwanted tripping and mechanical welding, ensuring continuous operation and safety during both normal and testing conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The vectorial sum of the currents in the active conductors is recorded by the summation current transformer and represents a measure of the residual current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

PTC resistors have a positive temperature coefficient, which increases their resistance when the ambient temperature increases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive temperature coefficient: Thermistor

Data Source

PatentEP2107662B8Residual current circuit breaker device
Publication Date: 2012.02.15 DOEPKE SCHALTGERATE

AI summary

The fault current protection switch unit has a total current converter (W1), through which the current conductors (1,2) are guided. Another total current converter (W2) is provided, which forms an alternative current path for the current flowing through the current conductors with reference to the former total current converter.