Circuit Breaker Control Unit Fastening for Breaking Shock Absorption
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing electrical circuit breakers face issues with HMI elements being fragile and prone to ejection or cracking due to breaking shocks during circuit operation, and traditional fastening methods exacerbate these issues.
Innovation Solution
A control unit design with a front sub-assembly secured by kinematic links allowing translation blocking and rotation freedom, using hooks and complementary members to distribute deformation and absorb shock without hard points, ensuring the sub-assembly bends but does not break.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If the front sub-assembly is rigidly fixed to the rear sub-assembly using traditional fastening elements (screws), then the front sub-assembly is securely attached, but local stresses increase during triggering which risks cracking the front sub-assembly and damaging HMI elements
Solution Approach 1:
The fastening members are designed to transition from a rigid fixed state during normal operation to a movable state during triggering. The front sub-assembly is allowed to move relative to the rear sub-assembly during breaking shocks, transforming the static rigid connection into a dynamic adaptive connection that absorbs shock energy and prevents stress concentration.
Solution Approach 2:
The mechanical properties of the connection between front and rear sub-assemblies change based on operational conditions. During normal operation, the connection provides strong attachment; during triggering, the connection allows movement and deformation. This parameter change enables the system to adapt to different stress conditions and prevent cracking.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If the front sub-assembly is made loose or removable to avoid stress concentration, then cracking is prevented, but the HMI elements become vulnerable to ejection during triggering
Solution Approach 1:
The connection between front and rear sub-assemblies is designed to be dynamic rather than static. During normal operation, the fastening members maintain a secure fixed connection that retains HMI elements. During triggering, the connection transitions to allow controlled movement and deformation, preventing cracking while maintaining HMI element retention through the distributed flexible attachment.
3Reliability
If the front sub-assembly is rigidly fixed to prevent ejection of HMI elements, then retention is improved, but the breaking shock causes cracking and damage to HMI elements
Solution Approach 1:
The fastening members are designed to transition from a rigid fixed state during normal operation to a movable state during triggering. The front sub-assembly is allowed to move relative to the rear sub-assembly during breaking shocks, transforming the static rigid connection into a dynamic adaptive connection that absorbs shock energy and prevents stress concentration.
Solution Approach 2:
The flexible connection design provides beforehand cushioning by allowing controlled deformation and movement during triggering. This pre-planned flexibility acts as a cushion that absorbs the breaking shock energy before it can reach and damage the HMI elements, while still maintaining sufficient retention.
4Strength
If traditional screw fastening is used to secure the front sub-assembly, then attachment is strong, but hard points are created that increase local stresses during triggering
Solution Approach 1:
The fastening members are designed to transition from a rigid fixed state during normal operation to a movable state during triggering. The front sub-assembly is allowed to move relative to the rear sub-assembly during breaking shocks, transforming the static rigid connection into a dynamic adaptive connection that absorbs shock energy and prevents stress concentration.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention extracts the rigid constraint function from the fastening system, removing the hard points that cause stress concentration. By allowing movement and deformation during triggering, the system eliminates the problematic rigid constraints while maintaining attachment strength during normal operation.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The design effectively distributes and absorbs breaking shocks, preventing ejection and cracking of HMI elements while maintaining operational integrity.
Implementation Method 1
the complementary members include a first complementary member, which cooperates with the first fastening member so as to form a first kinematic link between the front sub-assembly and the rear sub-assembly, the first kinematic link being such that: the first edge is blocked in translation relative to the rear sub-assembly according to a first direction parallel to the height axis, and the first edge is free in rotation relative to the rear sub-assembly around a first axis parallel to the transverse axis
Implementation Method 2
Thanks to the invention, the front sub-assembly is held, along the two transverse edges, by kinematic links blocking translation but allowing rotation. In other words, the central portion is free to elastically deform by bending. During a triggering of the breaker unit, the deformations caused by the breaking shock are thus distributed and absorbed over the entire front sub-assembly. The absence of hard points means that the front sub-assembly bends but does not break.
Data Source
AI summary
This control unit (20) comprises a casing (30) comprising a rear sub-assembly (34) and a front sub-assembly (100), which is assembled to the rear sub-assembly, and which comprises a central portion (102) with two opposing transverse edges (111, 112). The front sub-assembly (100) also comprises fastening members (121, 122) while the rear sub-assembly (34) comprises complementary members (131, 132), which are configured to cooperate with the fastening members to secure the front sub-assembly (100) to the rear sub-assembly (34), so that the two transverse edges are blocked in translation relative to the rear sub-assembly (34) according to two respective opposite and divergent directions, while each of the transverse edges is free to rotate relative to the rear sub-assembly (34) around an axis parallel to the considered transverse edge.


