Breast Prosthesis with Removable Silicone Shell

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing breast prostheses fail to accurately adapt to the changing size of the remaining breast during the regeneration phase after surgical removal and do not provide adequate hygiene or natural touch and movement properties.

Innovation Solution

A breast prosthesis with a silicone shell and a support shell surrounded by a fabric cover, allowing for adjustable filler material to accommodate changing breast size, with the silicone shell being removable for hygiene and providing a natural appearance and feel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a prosthesis with integrated fabric part and plastic body is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the fabric part cannot be removed for washing which is disadvantageous from hygienic aspects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidhygiene
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis is divided into separate components: a removable silicone shell and a support shell with fabric cover. This segmentation allows the silicone shell to be easily removed for washing, solving the hygiene problem while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The silicone shell is extracted as a separate removable component from the support shell. This extraction enables the silicone shell to be taken out for washing, directly addressing the hygienic disadvantage of integrated designs while preserving the structural integrity of the overall prosthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If a prosthesis with fixed volume is used, then the structure is simple, but it cannot adapt to changing breast size during regeneration phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis incorporates adjustable filling chambers that allow the volume to be dynamically changed during the regeneration phase. This dynamic adaptability enables the prosthesis to accommodate changing breast size while maintaining relatively simple structure through the use of expandable or adjustable filling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis allows changes in the volume parameter through adjustable filling chambers. By modifying the amount of filler material or the expandability of the chambers, the prosthesis can adapt to different breast sizes during regeneration without requiring complex structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If a prosthesis with support shell and filler material is used, then the weight is reduced, but the natural touch and movement properties are not reproduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidnatural appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis uses composite materials combining silicone shell with support shell and filler material. This composite structure achieves weight reduction through the support shell while the silicone shell provides natural touch and movement properties, resolving the contradiction between lightness and natural appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The silicone shell is positioned specifically at the front side where natural appearance and touch properties are most important. This local placement ensures that the critical aesthetic and tactile qualities are maintained in the visible and contact areas, while the support shell provides weight reduction in the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If a prosthesis without removable shell is used, then the structure is simple and integrated, but washing is difficult and hygienic aspects are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidease of washing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The silicone shell is segmented as a separate removable component from the support shell. This segmentation makes the silicone shell easily removable for washing, directly improving ease of operation while the modular design actually simplifies the overall structure compared to integrated designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The silicone shell is extracted as a removable component, enabling easy removal for washing. This extraction directly addresses the ease of washing problem while the modular architecture simplifies the overall device structure and improves maintainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9023104B2Breast prosthesis
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 AMOENA MEDIZIN ORTHOPADIE TECHN
  • US9023104B2 patent drawing
  • US9023104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A breast prosthesis is provided having a support shell which is accommodated in a fabric cover, wherein one or more filling chambers for accommodating a filler material is/are located at the rear side of the breast prosthesis, wherein the breast prosthesis has a silicone shell which is arranged in front of the support shell and which is accommodated in the fabric cover in removable manner.